N/A N=9

Optimising Consultation Summaries to Promote Good Health

Type1 Diabetes

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04002557 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Apr 2024

Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants That Completed Interviews About Consultation Summaries They Were Receiving — 9 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type: Observational
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Interview-Questionnaire (Other)
Age: Pediatric, Adult · 12+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Imperial College London
Primary completion: Aug 2019

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Number of Participants That Completed Interviews About Consultation Summaries They Were Receiving	9	—

Summary

Patient participation in decision making about their care promotes patient satisfaction and confidence. Further more, allowing patients to see letters written about them enables trust, encourages patients to be involved in decision making process and allow patient understanding. Little is known about how young people value these letters in the same way. Only one brief questionnaire study focused on adolescent views and found that young people wished to receive consultation summaries. This research aims explore the views of adolescent patients related to consultation summaries that they receive following a doctor's appointment. The investigator will use patients attending a specialist diabetes clinic as our cohort and conduct a qualitative study using focus groups.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Adolescents aged 12-18 years attending UCLH adolescent diabetes outpatient clinic

Exclusion Criteria

Young people who cannot speak English (effective communication with colleagues during the study is the major aspect of valid data collection)
Young people who refuse to participate in focus group discussions

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04002557). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.