Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=61 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Pain Control in Colorectal Surgery: Liposomal Bupivacaine Block Versus Intravenous Lidociane

Colorectal Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
61
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Verbal Pain Scale (VRS) - 4 Week Post-op — 0.4; 1.1 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Exparel (Drug); IV Lidocaine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Primary completion
May 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Verbal Pain Scale (VRS) - 4 Week Post-op
0.4; 1.1

Summary

To compare the analgesic impact of intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion with preoperative liposomal bupivacaine TAP block in colorectal surgery. This is to be integrated into the standard ERAS protocol currently utilized at Carolinas Medical Center. Primary endpoints will be postoperative pain as measured by verbal rate scale (VRS), postoperative morphine equivalents utilized per day, and over 30 days. Secondary endpoints will include date of ambulation, return of bowel function (first flatus), tolerance of goal diet, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting during hospital stay, length of stay (hospital and PACU), post-operative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo, related to both anesthesia and surgery), cost of hospitalization (operative, PACU, postoperative stay, and total) and quality of life on follow up.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years
  • Elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery
  • ASA I-III

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindication to Na Channel Blocker
  • Chronic Opioid use
  • Liver dysfunction
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Epilepsy
  • Psychomotor retardation
  • BMI >40
  • Sleep Apnea
  • Cardiac Rhythm Disorders
  • Planned open or concomitant procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04005859). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search