Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40 Randomized Treatment

Investigating the Effects of a Spinal Mobilisation Intervention in People With Lower Back Pain

Lower Back Pain

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Intervention Erector Spinae Stiffness Change — -10.959 Newton metres (Nm) — p=<0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Manual spinal mobilisations (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Edinburgh Napier University
Primary completion
Sep 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Intervention Erector Spinae Stiffness Change
-10.959 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Control Erector Spinae Stiffness Change.
12.192 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Intervention Erector Spinae Tone Change
-0.317 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Control Erector Spinae Tone Change
0.29 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Intervention Erector Spinae Elasticity Change
0.068 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Control Erector Spinae Elasticity Change
0.05 <0.001 sig

Summary

The objective of the study is to measure and analyse the effect of a spinal mobilisation intervention on muscle tissue quality in people with lower back pain. The mobilisation intervention will be compared to a control with participants taking part in both conditions for a factorial, within-subject repeated measures study. The study will analyse lumbar muscle response to the manual intervention and analyse the potential influence of anthropometric measures of participants. The study hypothesises a decrease in lumbar stiffness post the intervention, compared to the control session.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Suffering from lower back pain (region between 12th rib and gluteal folds), acute or chronic.

Exclusion Criteria

Respond positively to any absolute contraindications for spinal therapy, including:

  • segment instability
  • infectious disease
  • osteomyelitis
  • bone tumours
  • neurological deficit
  • upper motor neuron lesion
  • spinal cord damage
  • cervical arterial dysfunction

Respond positively to relative contra-indications, excluded based on severity, including:

  • osteoporosis
  • spinal instability
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • inflammatory disease
  • active history of cancer
  • hypermobile syndrome
  • segment hypermobility
  • cardiovascular disease
  • cervical anomalies
  • nerve root disorder
  • spinal surgery
  • respiratory problems
  • thrombosis
  • open wounds
  • local infection
  • fractures or dislocations
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04012970). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search