Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=83 Randomized Device Feasibility

HoloLens: an Objective Alternative to the Operator's Memory

Virtual Reality · Anesthesia · Epidural

Enrolled (actual)
83
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Procedure Time — 7.3; 4.5 Minutes — p=0.02

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
HoloLens-guided epidural (Device); US-guided epidural (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Primary completion
Feb 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Procedure Time
7.3; 4.5 0.02 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Needle Insertions
1.5; 1.3 0.31
SECONDARY
Number of Needle Passes
14.4; 7.2 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Bone Contacts
12.2; 6 0.03 sig
SECONDARY
Procedural Pain
2.6; 2.8 0.56
SECONDARY
Pain in PACU
2.6; 2.4 0.78
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Epidural Failure
3; 0 0.24
SECONDARY
Complications
0; 0

Summary

Neuraxial anesthesia has traditionally been a 'blind' technique relying on users' feel and skill, both are subjective, lack complete accuracy and influenced by patient's physique variations that are quite challenging, and lead to patient morbidity, infection, and nerve injury. The ultrasound(US) use allows real-time views of needle position thereby achieving higher success rates, fewer complications, and reduced patient discomfort. While US guidance for neuraxial procedures is popular, it is still relatively uncommon due to technical and anatomical challenges. The study investigators have created an innovative methodology to use with HoloLens, an augmented reality tool, to provide an accurate live road map for the needle path hidden under the patient's skin. This see-through model is an objective alternative to the user's memory for direct visualization of the needle virtual trajectory as it passed through the tissue and towards the 3D printed bone. Also, this model may have a variety uses in anesthesia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Trained in US-guided epidural technique with fellowship
  • Performed >100 thoracic US-guided epidural procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age <18
  • Lack of verbal patient assent after study introduction
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04028284). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search