Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=70 Randomized Single-blind Other

The Clinical Comparison of Somofilcon A 1 Day and Nelfilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04067141 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing — 90.9; 88.5 units on a scale

Summary

This subject-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study will compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the somofilcon A 1 day soft contact lens with the nelfilcon A daily disposable lens when used on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing
90.9; 88.5
PRIMARY
Subjective Comfort at Start of Day
89.9; 87.0
PRIMARY
Subjective Comfort at End of Day
75.9; 68.0
PRIMARY
Overall Subjective Comfort
86.1; 78.8
PRIMARY
Overall Subjective Comfort
86.1; 78.8
PRIMARY
Subjective Vision
90.9; 92.1
PRIMARY
Subjective Vision
90.9; 92.1
SECONDARY
Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Redness Score
0.85; 0.87
SECONDARY
Biomicroscopy - Limbal Redness Score
0.74; 0.79
SECONDARY
Biomicroscopy - Corneal Staining Score
0.33; 0.32
SECONDARY
Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Staining Score
1.46; 0.35
SECONDARY
Biomicroscopy - Papillary Conjunctivitis Score
1.02; 1.03
SECONDARY
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
0; 0; 3; 1; 41; 57
SECONDARY
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
0; 0; 3; 1; 41; 57
SECONDARY
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
0; 0; 23; 50; 44; 44
SECONDARY
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
0; 0; 23; 50; 44; 44
SECONDARY
Corneal Coverage Grade
0; 1; 36; 26; 64; 71
SECONDARY
Corneal Coverage Grade
0; 1; 36; 26; 64; 71
SECONDARY
Post-Blink Movement Grade
0; 0; 21; 26; 67; 46
SECONDARY
Post-Blink Movement Grade
0; 0; 21; 26; 67; 46
SECONDARY
Ocular Redness Rating
94.1; 92.8

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.00D (inclusive)
  • They have a maximum of -1.00DC ocular astigmatism in each eye.
  • They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lens types.
  • At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They currently use soft contact lenses or have done so in the previous six months.
  • They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least eight hours per day).
  • They own a wearable pair of spectacles.

Exclusion Criteria

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel, or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
  • They currently wear either the clariti 1day or the DAILIES AquaComfort Plus lens.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04067141). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search