Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40 Randomized Triple-blind Health Services Research

Beveled-Tip Versus(vs) Standard-Tip Vitrectomy Probe

Vitrectomy

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Completion of Core Vitrectomy and Shave of Vitreous Base — 9.7; 10.4 minutes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Utravit High-Speed 10000 cpm Beveled Probe (Device); standard vitrector probe- Alcon (non-beveled) Ultravit 7500 cpm (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Primary completion
Jan 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Completion of Core Vitrectomy and Shave of Vitreous Base
9.7; 10.4

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency of the new Utravit High-Speed 10000 cpm Beveled Probe to the current standard vitrector probe- Alcon (non-beveled) Ultravit 7500 cpm. Study Design: This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe with the current Alcon vitrector probe in a cohort of patients undergoing routine vitrectomy surgery. Hypothesis: The Advanced Ultravit high-speed beveled probe will show non-inferiority to the standard, Alcon (non-beveled) Ultravit 7500 cpm with regards to time to completion of vitrectomy and surgical outcomes.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The study population will be male and female patients 18 years old or older with the presence of pathology requiring routine vitreoretinal surgery (vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, vitreomacular traction, macular hole, epiretinal membrane) without previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Ability to consent to procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous incisional intraocular surgery other than uncomplicated cataract surgery with intraocular lens placement
  • Inability to consent for procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04076072). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search