Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=53 Randomized Treatment

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pegcetacoplan in Patients With PNH

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04085601 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
53
Serious AEs
14.1%
Results posted
Oct 2022
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Subjects Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Stabilization — 30; 0 Participants — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Emerging
6citations · ~2 / year
The cost-effectiveness of pegcetacoplan in complement treatment-naïve adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the USA.
Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Pegcetacoplan in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria .

Linked Publications (5)

  • The cost-effectiveness of pegcetacoplan in complement treatment-naïve adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the USA.
    Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023 · 6 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L index for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in France.
    Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023 · 6 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Efficacy and Safety Maintained up to 3 Years in Adults with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Receiving Pegcetacoplan.
    Advances in therapy · 2025 · 4 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Improvements in hematologic markers and decreases in fatigue with pegcetacoplan for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and mild or moderate anemia (hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL) who had received eculizumab or were naive to complement inhibitors.
    PloS one · 2024 · 2 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Normalization of Hemoglobin, Lactate Dehydrogenase, and Fatigue in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Treated with Pegcetacoplan.
    Drugs in R&D · 2024 · 1 citation · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Subjects Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Stabilization
30; 0 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Concentration At Week 26
-1870.47; -400.09 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With an Hb Response in the Absence of Transfusions
25; 1 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Absolute Reticulocyte Count (ARC) at Week 26
-123.26; -19.44 0.0002 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Week 26
2.94; 0.27 0.0019 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects Who Received Transfusion or Decrease of Hb >2 g/dL From Baseline
11.4; 100 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects With Transfusion Avoidance
91.4; 5.6 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of PRBC Units Transfused From Baseline Through Week 26
0.0; 3.0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale Score at Week 26
7.78; 3.26 0.061
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects With Hb Normalization Levels at Week 26
45.7; 0 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects With LDH Normalization at Week 26
65.7; 0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) Scores at Week 26
18.90; -2.85 0.0006 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Linear Analog Assessment (LASA) Scales Score at Week 26
50.39; -5.39 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects With ARC Normalization
60.0; 5.6 0.0002 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Failure of Hb Stabilization
4; 18 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Time to First PRBC Transfusion
NA; 7.000 <0.0001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Be at least 18 years old (inclusive).
  • Have LDH ≥1.5 x ULN at the screening visit.
  • Have PNH diagnosis, confirmed by high sensitivity flow cytometry (granulocyte or monocyte clone >10%).
  • Have Hb less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) at the screening visit.
  • Have ferritin greater than/equal to the LLN, or total iron binding capacity (TIBC) less than/equal to ULN at the screening visit, based on central laboratory reference ranges. If a subject is receiving iron supplements at screening, the Investigator must ensure that the subject's dose has been stable for 4 weeks prior to screening, and it must be maintained throughout the study. Subjects not receiving iron at screening must not start iron supplementation during the course of the study.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m2 at the screening visit.
  • Have a platelet count of >50, 000/mm3 at the screening visit.
  • Have an absolute neutrophil count >500/mm3 at the screening visit.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treatment with any complement inhibitor (eg, eculizumab) within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Hereditary complement deficiency.
  • History of bone marrow transplantation.
  • Concomitant use of any of the following medications is prohibited if not on a stable regimen for the time period indicated below prior to screening:
  • Erythropoietin or immunosuppressants for at least 8 weeks
  • Systemic corticosteroids for at least 4 weeks
  • Vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) with a stable international normalized ratio (INR) for at least 4 weeks
  • Iron supplements, vitamin B12, or folic acid for at least 4 weeks
  • Low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 4 weeks
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04085601) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search