Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=15 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Mixed Methods Investigation of Chronic Facial Paralysis in Individuals With Synkinesis

Synkinesis

Enrolled (actual)
15
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) Between Baseline and 4 Month Scoring — 0.29; 5.86 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Neuromuscular Retraining Therapy (4 months) (Other); Chemodenervation (4 months) (Drug); Neuromuscular Retraining + Chemodenervation (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Primary completion
Aug 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) Between Baseline and 4 Month Scoring
0.29; 5.86
PRIMARY
Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) at Baseline
65.71; 54.29
PRIMARY
Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) at 4 Months
66.00; 60.14
PRIMARY
Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) at 8 Months
73.00; 60.25
SECONDARY
Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) at Baseline
54.92; 52.70
SECONDARY
Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) at 4 Months
64.07; 63.18
SECONDARY
Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) at 8 Months
55.55; 56.67
SECONDARY
Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) at Baseline
56.43; 42.14
SECONDARY
Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) at 4 Months
63.10; 45.95
SECONDARY
Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) at 8 Months
71.67; 61.67
SECONDARY
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Baseline
6.14; 10.29; 5.71; 7.00
SECONDARY
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 4 Months
6.57; 8.00; 4.14; 5.60
SECONDARY
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 8 Months
6.67; 7.50; 5.50; 2.67
SECONDARY
Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) at Baseline
40.00; 51.43
SECONDARY
Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) at 4 Months
31.71; 45.40
SECONDARY
Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) at 8 Months
32.57; 42.17
SECONDARY
Pre-Treatment Qualitative Interviews
SECONDARY
Post-Treatment Qualitative Interviews
2; 4; 4; 1; 1; 2

Summary

This proposal will prospectively assess the social, physical, and emotional recognition function in participants with synkinesis. It will measure the effectiveness of neuromuscular retraining therapy to improve muscle coordination compared to chemodenervation, the more established treatment modality, in a single-blinded, randomized control trial using clinician- and patient-reported outcomes measures. The hypothesis tested is that participants undergoing neuromuscular retraining therapy will achieve greater improvement on clinical outcome measures as compared to participants receiving chemodenervation. In this clinical trial, 36 participants undergoing treatment for synkinesis will be enrolled into one of two treatment arms: chemodenervation or neuromuscular retraining therapy. Participants can expect to be on study for approximately 8 months. Participants who enroll in this mixed methods investigation will be recruited from patients of the University of Wisconsin Facial Nerve Clinic and also be enrolled in a another study for assessment [Perception of Emotion Expression in Clinical Populations with Facial Paralysis, IRB approval 2015-0366].

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Has ipsilateral synkinesis of facial muscles
  • It has been at least four months since their onset of peripheral facial paralysis from any cause
  • Ability to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria

  • previous treatment with reanimation surgery (except for upper eyelid weight placement)
  • intolerance or contraindication to botulinum toxin injection
  • previous treatment for synkinesis with chemodenervation or neuromuscular retraining therapy
  • pregnant and/or breastfeeding women
  • participants with impaired decision-making capacity, including those with severe psychiatric illnesses
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04148872). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search