Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Comparing a Fatherhood Focused Individual Intervention to Batterer Intervention to Reduce IPV and Child Maltreatment

Intimate Partner Violence

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
6.7%
Results posted
Apr 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Completion Rate — 20; 21 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
F4C (Behavioral); BIP (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
Yale University
Primary completion
Jul 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Completion Rate
20; 21
PRIMARY
Working Alliance Inventory Sum Score
62.52; 55.82 <.01 sig
PRIMARY
Client Satisfaction Sum Score
7.75; 7.33 .08
SECONDARY
Reflective Functioning
2.46; 2.57; 2.39; 2.23 .116
SECONDARY
Emotional Regulation
34.61; 28.64; 29.20; 28.32 <.05 sig
SECONDARY
Intimate Partner Violence
1.70; 4.28 .13
SECONDARY
Child Maltreatment
1.19; 3.48 .35

Summary

This randomized trial will test a newly developed intervention aimed at fathers who have a history of family violence compared to a standard batterer intervention program.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • A reported an incident of IPV (pushing, slapping, kicking) within the last 12 months prior to screening (based on court/police records, partner or self- report);
  • have at least one biological child aged 6 months to 7 years with whom they have contact in person or by phone/facetime etc. at least monthly;
  • are able to complete assessments in English;
  • agree to have their female coparents (mother of the youngest child) contacted as collateral informants and for consent for participation of their shared child.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Men who have an active full/no contact protective order pertaining to their child since this will preclude participation in the father-child play assessment (many men will have full no-contact orders with their partners, but it is more common for men to still be allowed at least supervised contact with their children even with a full/no contact order with their partner);
  • physiological addiction to a substance that requires detoxification. Fathers will be evaluated using the Addiction Severity Index and urine toxicology screens. If fathers report difficulties with physiological withdrawal from substances (e.g. delirium tremens, shaking, nausea) they will be referred for detox services. They can be re-evaluated following a detox program with documentation from the detox center of successful completion and clean urine screen.;
  • anyone with a cognitive impairment that will not allow for understanding of the study interventions (a mini mental state score <25);
  • anyone with a current untreated psychotic disorder;
  • anyone currently suicidal or homicidal based on screening using the BSI.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04165291). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search