N/A
N=38
Extension Study for 43USSA1705
Nasolabial Folds
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04225273 ↗Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
2.6%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96 — -1.3; -1.2; -1.2; -1.1 units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Sculptra Aesthetic, Lidocaine HCL (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Primary completion
- Jan 2021
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96 |
-1.3; -1.2; -1.2; -1.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Based on the Participants Live Assessment |
30; 30 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the GAIS Based on the Investigator Live Assessment |
35; 35 | — |
| SECONDARY FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lines Rasch Transformed Total Scores: NLF Questionnaire |
69.8; 70.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Recommend the Treatment to a Friend? |
33; 2; 31; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You do the Treatment Again? |
32; 3; 32; 3 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Subtle Treatment Results Over Time Was Worth it? |
18; 14; 2; 1; 0; 20 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Treatment Results Are Natural Looking? |
26; 7; 1; 0; 1; 20 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Facial Symmetry/Balance? |
14; 14; 4; 2; 1; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look the Way You Feel? |
11; 16; 5; 3; 0; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look/Feel More Confident in Your Life? |
12; 16; 4; 3; 0; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Self-confidence? |
14; 13; 5; 3; 0; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Overall Satisfaction With Your Appearance? |
12; 17; 3; 3; 0; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Feel Better About Yourself? |
17; 13; 2; 3; 0; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Attractiveness? |
11; 18; 3; 3; 0; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look Younger? |
13; 18; 1; 3; 0; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs |
24; 1 | — |
Summary
To evaluate the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Randomized to Sculptra Aesthetic 8ml reconstitution and successfully completed study 43USSA1705
Exclusion Criteria
- Medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
- Participation in any interventional clinical study throughout the duration of the study
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04225273). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.