Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=38 Treatment

Extension Study for 43USSA1705

Nasolabial Folds

Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
2.6%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96 — -1.3; -1.2; -1.2; -1.1 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Sculptra Aesthetic, Lidocaine HCL (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Galderma R&D
Primary completion
Jan 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96
-1.3; -1.2; -1.2; -1.1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Based on the Participants Live Assessment
30; 30
SECONDARY
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the GAIS Based on the Investigator Live Assessment
35; 35
SECONDARY
FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lines Rasch Transformed Total Scores: NLF Questionnaire
69.8; 70.2
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Recommend the Treatment to a Friend?
33; 2; 31; 4
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You do the Treatment Again?
32; 3; 32; 3
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Subtle Treatment Results Over Time Was Worth it?
18; 14; 2; 1; 0; 20
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Treatment Results Are Natural Looking?
26; 7; 1; 0; 1; 20
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Facial Symmetry/Balance?
14; 14; 4; 2; 1; 13
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look the Way You Feel?
11; 16; 5; 3; 0; 10
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look/Feel More Confident in Your Life?
12; 16; 4; 3; 0; 11
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Self-confidence?
14; 13; 5; 3; 0; 12
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Overall Satisfaction With Your Appearance?
12; 17; 3; 3; 0; 12
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Feel Better About Yourself?
17; 13; 2; 3; 0; 13
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Attractiveness?
11; 18; 3; 3; 0; 12
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look Younger?
13; 18; 1; 3; 0; 13
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
24; 1

Summary

To evaluate the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Randomized to Sculptra Aesthetic 8ml reconstitution and successfully completed study 43USSA1705

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion
  • Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
  • Participation in any interventional clinical study throughout the duration of the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04225273). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search