Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=76 Basic Science

The Role of Different Prefrontal Areas in Visual Metacognition

Healthy

Enrolled (actual)
76
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Average Confidence Difference With the 0 ms Condition — 0.14; 0.14; 0.14; 0.15 score on a scale (1-4) — p=<.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Georgia Institute of Technology
Primary completion
Aug 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Average Confidence Difference With the 0 ms Condition
0.14; 0.14; 0.14; 0.15; -0.01; -0.04 <.001 sig
PRIMARY
Average Mratio Difference With the 0 ms Condition
0.014; 0.087; 0.043; 0.070; -0.211; -0.170 >0.19

Summary

The study will use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the causal role of different brain regions during visual perception. TMS is a well-established technique used by hundreds of labs in the world. The risks associated with the technique are well understood and can be minimized by strict adherence to established safety guidelines. In the proposed study, the investigators will use TMS to specifically address the topic of how metacognitive evaluation is supported by the two prefrontal areas: the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). The data will be collected from healthy adults and will ultimately deepen the investigator's understanding of the mechanisms behind the normal processes related to confidence generation and metacognition.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • right-handed
  • adults 18-40
  • with normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Exclusion Criteria

  • history of seizures
  • family history of epilepsy
  • stroke
  • severe headaches
  • metal anywhere in the head (excluding the mouth)
  • cardiac pacemakers
  • current use of medication for neurological or psychiatric conditions
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04263766). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search