Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=52 Randomized Double-blind Other

Fertility Preservation in Male AYA With Cancer

Infertility, Male

Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Fertility Preservation (FP) Uptake — 10; 9 Participants — p==.64

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
FP Decision Tool and Discussion (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 12+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
Leena Nahata
Primary completion
Jan 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Fertility Preservation (FP) Uptake
10; 9 =.64
SECONDARY
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - AYA
1.7; 1.1; 5.7; 6.0; 6.1; 6.3
SECONDARY
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - Caregiver
1.8; 1.4; 5.4; 5.9; 6.5; 7.0
SECONDARY
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - AYA
1.7; 1.1; 5.7; 6.0; 6.1; 6.3
SECONDARY
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - Caregiver
1.8; 1.4; 5.4; 5.9; 6.5; 7.0

Summary

Very little is known about how medical providers can help adolescent and young adults (AYAs) and their caregivers make decisions about fertility preservation (sperm banking) before beginning cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to see if having a guided conversation about fertility preservation increases preservation rates and/or satisfaction with the decision among AYA males with cancer. The primary hypothesis is that compared to standard of care control group (routine fertility consult at diagnosis, n=20), AYAs in the intervention arm (routine fertility consult at diagnosis + FP Decision Tool and Facilitated Conversation by trained interventionist) will have higher rates of FP uptake. The secondary hypothesis is that families in the intervention group will report better FP decision quality compared to those in the control arm.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male
  • Aged 12-25 years
  • Expected to have adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or gonadal radiation) for newly diagnosed cancer
  • Pubertal (at least Tanner stage 2-3, eligible for sperm banking as determined in the fertility consult)
  • Proficient in English

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cognitive deficit that precludes completing measures
  • Parents are non-English speaking
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04268004). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search