Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=77 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Intralesional Vitamin D Injection for Treatment of Common Warts

Warts

Enrolled (actual)
77
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Complete Regression of Wart — 12; 10 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Vitamin D3 (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Stephen P. Merry
Primary completion
Apr 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Complete Regression of Wart
12; 10
SECONDARY
Regression of Wart at 4 Weeks
2; 2
SECONDARY
Regression of Wart at 8 Weeks
4; 7
SECONDARY
Regression of Wart at 12 Weeks
7; 8

Summary

Researchers are trying to find out if injecting Vitamin D into a wart is an effective treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Rochester practices
  • Patients suffering from one or more cutaneous warts as diagnosed by the examining physician at baseline visit on typical diagnostic characteristics
  • Able to provide consent
  • Both recalcitrant and non-recalcitrant warts will be included

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with prior use of home or office-based destructive treatments for this wart(s) in the last 1 month with salicylic acid (SA) or cryotherapy
  • Immunoadjuvant therapy for warts in the last 4 months (e.g Candida)
  • History of vitamin D injection of warts ever
  • High-dose vitamin D supplementation (>4, 000 IU daily or equivalent) in the preceding 3 months
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Facial or genital warts
  • Lesions not felt by the examining clinician to be a wart (e.g., corns or calluses)
  • Immunosuppression (to include immunosuppressive medications or conditions as judged by the physician evaluating the patient at the baseline visit).
  • Allergy to sesame oil
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04278573). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search