Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=43 Randomized Treatment

Punch vs. Drill Tunnel Use for Anchor Tunnel Creation and Correlation With Post-operative Pain

Rotator Cuff Tears

Enrolled (actual)
43
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function Short Form — 41.51; 40.54; 36.81; 32.16 T-Score

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
suture anchor socket creation with punch (Procedure); suture anchor socket creation with drill (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Matt Smith
Primary completion
Jun 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function Short Form
41.51; 40.54; 36.81; 32.16; 42.74; 37.90
PRIMARY
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
35.86; 32.14; 22.0; 17.06; 35; 22.5
PRIMARY
Visual Analogue Scale
4.86; 4.95; 1.14; 3.56; 1.78; 2.11
PRIMARY
PROMIS - Pain Interference
62.23; 63.11; 54.76; 61.66; 55.02; 58.52
SECONDARY
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Shoulder
20.4; 21.7

Summary

To determine if different techniques used in the creation of suture anchor socket creation can influence post-op pain following rotator cuff repair.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

a. Patient's aged 18-80 years old with diagnosis of rotator cuff tear having failed non-operative management and being indicated for surgical intervention with use of suture anchors.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Glenohumeral arthrosis
  • Previous shoulder surgery
  • Psychiatric diseasesMRI
  • Rheumatologic diseases
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Spine diseases
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04288570). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search