Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=46 Treatment

Tislelizumab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Enrolled (actual)
46
Serious AEs
28.9%
Results posted
Sep 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Overall Response Rate (ORR) — 64.3; 64.5; 64.4 Percentage of Participants — p=0.0044

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Tislelizumab (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
BeiGene
Primary completion
Dec 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
64.3; 64.5; 64.4 0.0044 sig
SECONDARY
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
42.9; 25.8; 31.1
SECONDARY
Duration of Response (DOR)
12.25; 6.64; 12.25
SECONDARY
Time to Response (TTR)
2.69; 2.69; 2.69
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
12; 30; 4; 12; 4; 9

Summary

This was a Phase 2 trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab in participants with relapsed or hard-to-treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Participants were grouped by prior treatments. The main outcome was to assess overall response rate (ORR) across both cohorts. Participants continued receiving the study treatment until their disease got worse, side effects became too severe, or they chose to stop for other reasons.

Eligibility Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).
  • Participants had either:
  • Relapsed cHL, defined as disease progression after a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to their most recent therapy; or
  • Refractory cHL, defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to their most recent therapy.

Participants were assigned to one of two cohorts based on the following:

Cohort 1: Participants who were relapsed or refractory after prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT):

  • Had failed to achieve a response or had experienced disease progression following autologous HSCT (a transplant using the participant's own stem cells).
  • Were not considered candidates for additional autologous or allogeneic HSCT (a transplant using donor stem cells).

Cohort 2: Participants who were relapsed or refractory to salvage chemotherapy and had not received prior HSCT:

  • Were not considered candidates for autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
  • Had received at least one prior systemic therapy regimen for cHL.
  • Participants had measurable disease, defined as at least one positron emission tomography (PET)-positive, 2-\[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-avid nodal lesion greater than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest diameter, or at least one FDG-avid extranodal lesion (hepatic nodule) greater than 1.0 cm in longest diameter.
  • Participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1, indicating full activity or restricted activity but capable of self-care.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants had nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma or gray zone lymphoma.
  • Participants had received prior allogeneic HSCT.
  • Participants had received prior therapy targeting immune checkpoint pathways, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4).
  • Participants had active autoimmune disease or a history of autoimmune disease with potential to relapse.

Note: Additional inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the protocol may have applied.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04318080). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search