N/A
Completed N=80
Interest of Hypnosis on Pain Management During a Guided Echo Infiltration of the Hand
Hand Injuries
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04328623 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Evaluate the Pain Felt in Patients Who Have Benefited From a Hypnosis Session Before a Hand Infiltration Versus Hand Infiltration Without Hypnosis — 4.56; 1.75 units on a scale — p=<0.001
Summary
Ultrasound-guided infiltration is a common procedure and is known to be locally painful. This care-induced pain leads to strong apprehension in patients who need to benefit from this procedure.
The practice of hypnosis to improve the patient's comfort during a treatment has appeared progressively in hospital departments.
Among the various existing conversational hypnosis techniques, there is the "magic glove" technique. This is the technique that will be used in this study.
The investigators wish to evaluate the interest of hypnosis on the pain felt by the patient when performing an echo-guided infiltration of the hand, one of the most painful extremities during infiltrations.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Evaluate the Pain Felt in Patients Who Have Benefited From a Hypnosis Session Before a Hand Infiltration Versus Hand Infiltration Without Hypnosis |
4.56; 1.75 | <0.001 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient with an indication of a first hand infiltration under ultrasound examination
- Major patient
- Patient with capacity to understand the protocol and has given oral consent to participate in the research,
- Patient with social security coverage.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient having preventively applied a pain patch to the area to be infiltrated
- Contraindication to infiltrations ( imbalanced diabetes, imbalanced,hypertension, ongoing infections).
- Hearing impaired patient
- Patient under guardianship/curtel
- Minor
- Pregnant woman
- Patient participating in another intervention research protocol
- Patient unable to follow the protocol as judged by the investigator.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04328623). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.