N/A
N=48
Temperature Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery: Agreement Between Different Clinical Methods
Temperature Change, Body
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04355013 ↗Enrolled (actual)
48
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Oct 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Agreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods — 35.0; 35.2; 35.6; 34.8 celsius degrees (mean difference)
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Core emperature monitoring (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Agreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods |
35.0; 35.2; 35.6; 34.8; 34.8 | — |
Summary
Observational study to compare core temperatures obtained by 6 methods in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Only patients requiring a pulmonary artery catheter were included.
Exclusion Criteria
- Sepsis or previous fever.
- Previous bladder catheter without termistor
- Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04355013). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.