Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=19 Randomized Single-blind Other

Virtual Reality vs Technical Video in Surgical Training

Surgical Training

Enrolled (actual)
19
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) — 15.9; 9.4 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Immersive Virtual Reality (Other); Surgical Technical Instructional Video (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Primary completion
Feb 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)
15.9; 9.4
SECONDARY
Global Ratings Scale (GRS)
22.8; 22.4
SECONDARY
Transfer of Training (ToT)
59.4
SECONDARY
Transfer Effectiveness Ratio (TER)
0.79

Summary

The use of instructional technical surgical videos is common in orthopaedic education. Many residents have used instructional technical surgical training videos prior to medical school, as well as during their residency program, and at instructional courses. The use of instructional technical surgical videos and multimedia is considered an adjunctive training method for orthopaedic residents to learn operative procedures. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) is increasingly used in surgical education. Recently, iVR has shown transfer of skill training in orthopaedics. The continued study of the effectiveness of iVR training in orthopaedic education could benefit new competency based orthopaedics residency programs. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of instructional technical surgical video training to immersive iVR training for teaching technical skills of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Our hypothesis was that iVR improved learning effectiveness compared to standard technical surgical video. Secondary objectives include validating a virtual reality ratings scale through correlation to real-world performance. We proposed a randomized, blinded intervention-control trial directly comparing immersive iVR versus technical surgical instructional video training in the teaching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in senior residents, learning at the 2020 annual Canadian Shoulder and Elbow Society meeting.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Senior residents (4th and 5th year residents) attending 2020 CSES course

Exclusion Criteria

  • N/A
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04404010). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search