Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=20 Randomized Treatment

Povidone-Iodine Vs Essential Oil Vs Tap Water Gargling For COVID-19 Patients

COVID-19

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Early Viral Clearance — 5; 4; 1; 0 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Povidone-Iodine (Drug); Essential oils (Drug); Tap water (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
Primary completion
Jun 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Early Viral Clearance
5; 4; 1; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Negative RT-PCR Results
5; 4; 2; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Patients That Progress to More Severe Disease
0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Abnormal Radiological Findings
0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Findings
0; 0; 0; 0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of regular gargling to eliminate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the throat and nasopharynx. This 4 arms interventional study compares the effect of gargling using povidone-iodine, essential oils- based, tap water with control (no intervention) among Stage 1 coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. Findings from this study will provide new insight into the importance of gargling in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult aged 18 years and above
  • able to understand instructions
  • Stage 1 COVID-19
  • < 5 days of illness or diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Less than 18 years old
  • Unable to understand instructions
  • Stage 2 & 3 COVID-19
  • Respiratory symptoms or fever on admission
  • Abnormal chest radiograph or computed tomography (CT) findings on admission
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04410159). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search