Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=66 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Isokinetic Performance After Cruciate-substituting Ultra-congruent and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties

Osteoarthritis, Knee · Knee Arthritis

Enrolled (actual)
66
Serious AEs
4.6%
Results posted
Feb 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Baseline Assessment of Peak Knee Extensor Torque Preoperatively — 55.56; 58.33 Newton meters

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Vanguard® Knee System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 55+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital
Primary completion
Mar 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Baseline Assessment of Peak Knee Extensor Torque Preoperatively
55.56; 58.33
PRIMARY
Baseline Assessment of Peak Knee Flexor Torque Preoperatively
37.84; 40.3
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Extensor Torque at 3 Months Postoperatively
44.38; 45.85
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Flexor Torque at 3 Months Postoperatively
31.91; 29.39
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Extensor Torque at 6 Months Postoperatively
53.53; 52.64
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Flexor Torque at 6 Months Postoperatively
36.19; 35.27
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Extensor Torque at 12 Months Postoperatively
59.34; 61.52
PRIMARY
Assessment of Peak Knee Flexor Torque at 12 Months Postoperatively
39.94; 41.18
SECONDARY
Baseline Knee Society Clinical Score Evaluation
47.69; 49.15
SECONDARY
Knee Society Clinical Score Evaluation at 3 Months Postoperatively
78.81; 79.48
SECONDARY
Knee Society Clinical Score Evaluation at 6 Months Postoperatively
86.81; 88.39
SECONDARY
Knee Society Clinical Score Evaluation at 12 Months Postoperatively
90.69; 92.24
SECONDARY
Baseline Knee Society Functional Score Evaluation
49.53; 51.27
SECONDARY
Knee Society Functional Score Evaluation at 3 Months Postoperatively
64.47; 65.73
SECONDARY
Knee Society Functional Score Evaluation at 6 Months Postoperatively
70.22; 72.21
SECONDARY
Knee Society Functional Score Evaluation at 12 Months Postoperatively
81.47; 82.79

Summary

The choice between ultra-congruent (UC) insert or posterior cruciate ligament-stabilized (PS) insert in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrificing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debatable. Despite the potential advantages of the UC insert over PS insert with its different design, there are concerns about inferior clinical outcome related to its use. Therefore, isokinetic performance was used in this study to objectively evaluate knee function after TKA and the clinical scores of the patients were also evaluated. To the best of our knowledge, no prospective randomized study has compared the isokinetic performance of the knee following the use of UC and PS inserts in TKA. The hypothesis of the present study was that compared with the PS insert, the UC insert would be associated with a lower clinical outcome and isokinetic performance following TKA. A total of 65 patients scheduled to undergo TKA on for primary knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either the UC (32 patients) or the PS group (33 patients). The Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance results of each patient were recorded preoperatively and at postoperative 3, 6 and 12 months. The physiatrist performing isokinetic tests and patients were blinded to the study.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age between 55 and 80 years
  • Scheduled to undergo unilateral TKA on for primary knee osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Rheumatological joint diseases
  • Previous knee surgery
  • Neuromuscular diseases
  • Bilateral TKA
  • Insufficiency of collateral ligaments
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04419311). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search