Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=66 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

High-dose vs. Standard-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04471246 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
66
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Patient Recruitment Rate — 51.5 percentage of eligible patients
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
1,511citations · ~126 / year
Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014 · Open access · High-confidence link

Summary

Cellulitis is a painful bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue that needs antibiotic treatment. There are approximately 193,000 visits to Canadian emergency departments (EDs) each year for cellulitis. Emergency doctors who treat patients with cellulitis must decide on the correct antibiotic agent, dose, duration and frequency. Cellulitis is most commonly treated with the oral antibiotic cephalexin. However, there has been little research to guide doctors with respect to cellulitis treatment, which has led to an overuse of intravenous antibiotics. In addition, the current treatment failure rate of 20% is unacceptably high. When compared to standard-dose oral cephalexin, high-dose oral cephalexin may reduce treatment failure, which would help decrease the need for intravenous antibiotics and subsequent hospitalization. A well-designed clinical trial is necessary to determine if high-dose oral cephalexin reduces treatment failure for cellulitis patients. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility and design of such a clinical trial.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014 · 1,511 citations · Open access · High-confidence link
  • Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): practice guidelines for management and care transitions in the emergency department and hospital.
    The Journal of emergency medicine · 2015 · 111 citations · High-confidence link
  • Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in a Canadian emergency department.
    CJEM · 2009 · 53 citations · Open access · High-confidence link
  • In the clinic. Cellulitis and soft-tissue infections.
    Annals of internal medicine · 2009 · 40 citations · High-confidence link
  • Predictors of Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure for Nonpurulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Emergency Department.
    Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019 · 19 citations · High-confidence link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patient Recruitment Rate
51.5
PRIMARY
Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure
3.2; 12.9
SECONDARY
Ability to Approach Eligible Patients
14.2
SECONDARY
Assessment of Blinding
33.3; 60.1
SECONDARY
Protocol Adherence
75.8; 75.8
SECONDARY
Loss to Follow-up
6.1; 6.1
SECONDARY
Clinical Cure
45.2; 38.7; 16.1; 6.5
SECONDARY
Adverse Events
9.7; 3.2; 16.1; 6.5; 3.2; 0
SECONDARY
Unplanned ED Visits or Hospitalization
6.5; 6.5; 22.6; 16.1; 0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Adults (age >=18 years) with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age =38C plus absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/uL)
  • Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient
  • Renal impairment with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin
  • Inability to provide consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04471246) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search