Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=202 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

RHA® 3 Versus Restylane-L® for Lip Augmentation

Lip Augmentation · Lip

Enrolled (actual)
202
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Dec 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in TLFS Score (Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale) Between Baseline and Week 12 After Last Treatment of RHA®3 Versus Control Device, as Assessed by the BLE — 1.0; 0.8 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
RHA 3 (Device); Restylane-L (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Teoxane SA
Primary completion
May 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in TLFS Score (Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale) Between Baseline and Week 12 After Last Treatment of RHA®3 Versus Control Device, as Assessed by the BLE
1.0; 0.8
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in TLFS Score as Assessed by the BLE at Visit 5 (Weeks 24 After Last Treatment), 6 (Weeks 36 After Last Treatment), 7 (Week 52 After Last Treatment) if Applicable, and Re-treatment (4 Weeks After Re-treatment)
0.7; 0.5; 0.5; 0.1; 1.0; 0.9
SECONDARY
Responder Rate Calculated Using TLFS Assessed by the BLE
105; 29; 81; 22; 38; 6
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" With Study Treatment Using the Subject Satisfaction Scale at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Weeks After Re-treatment.
113; 33; 108; 27; 67; 16
SECONDARY
Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the "Satisfaction With Lips" FACE-Q | Aesthetics© Scale Questionnaire at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Week After Re-treatment.
50.6; 46.1; 40.9; 31.8; 36.2; 25.1
SECONDARY
Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the "Satisfaction With Outcome" FACE-Q | Aesthetics© Scale Questionnaire at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Week After Re-treatment.
77.2; 71.1; 73.8; 61.9; 75.6; 61.6
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects Scored Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Scale by the BLE.
134; 41; 113; 29; 58; 11

Summary

This is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, prospective, controlled clinical study to identify whether RHA® 3 is non-inferior to Restylane-L® for lip augmentation at Week 12 after the last treatment (initial or touch-up). At screening, the treating investigator (TI) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the validated Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale (5-grade) for eligibility of the subject for the study. At screening, the blinded live evaluator (BLE) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the TLFS to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessment of effectiveness. Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to either the RHA® 3 or the Restylane-L® treatment group. Subjects will be blinded to the study treatment. The TI will administer the fillers, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment 4 weeks after the initial treatment to optimize the results. If the touch-up treatment is administered, the subject will be asked to come to the site for an additional visit 4 weeks after the touch-up injection. The study duration was extended from 36 to 52 weeks once all subjects had already been enrolled. Nearly 60% of the subjects consented to extend the study to 52 weeks before being eligible for repeat treatment. All data are presented up to 52 weeks (as well as 4 more weeks follow-up after retreatment at 36 or 52 weeks). Subjects will be followed for 36 to 52 weeks after their last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up), at which point, they will be offered re-treatment with RHA® 3, regardless of their original treatment, provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees. Reasons for not administering the re-treatment will be documented. The subject will then be followed for an additional 4 weeks before exiting the study. If the subject or the TI declines re-treatment, this visit (36 or 52 weeks after the last treatment) will be considered the study Exit visit. For subjects with re-treatment, the Exit visit will be 4 weeks after the re-treatment. The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at each study visit (up to 36 weeks or 52 (if applicable) weeks after the last treatment, and 4 weeks after re treatment) or until all treatment-related ongoing adverse events (AEs) have resolved or resolved with sequelae as per TI judgment or if follow-up is no longer possible.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older
  • Lip fullness of grade 1 to 3 on the TLFS (ranging from 1 to 5) who desire at least 1 point of correction for upper and/or lower lips OR has Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI and has lip fullness grade 4 or 5 on the TLFS who desire treatment to the vermillion body for upper and/or lower lips. The BLE and TI must independently assess and agree that this criterion is met; however, concordance of fullness is not required. If the assessments of the TI and the BLE are the same or differ by exactly 1 point on the scale, this difference is considered acceptable. If the assessments differ by 2 points or more on the scale, the subject will not be eligible.
  • Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
  • Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
  • Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form and the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form prior to any study- related procedures being performed.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects that are pregnant, breast-feeding or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control
  • Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices
  • Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months
  • Has a history of or currently has an auto-immune disease.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04540913). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search