N/A
N=202
RHA® 3 Versus Restylane-L® for Lip Augmentation
Lip Augmentation · Lip
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04540913 ↗Enrolled (actual)
202
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Dec 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in TLFS Score (Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale) Between Baseline and Week 12 After Last Treatment of RHA®3 Versus Control Device, as Assessed by the BLE — 1.0; 0.8 score on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- RHA 3 (Device); Restylane-L (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Teoxane SA
- Primary completion
- May 2022
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in TLFS Score (Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale) Between Baseline and Week 12 After Last Treatment of RHA®3 Versus Control Device, as Assessed by the BLE |
1.0; 0.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in TLFS Score as Assessed by the BLE at Visit 5 (Weeks 24 After Last Treatment), 6 (Weeks 36 After Last Treatment), 7 (Week 52 After Last Treatment) if Applicable, and Re-treatment (4 Weeks After Re-treatment) |
0.7; 0.5; 0.5; 0.1; 1.0; 0.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Responder Rate Calculated Using TLFS Assessed by the BLE |
105; 29; 81; 22; 38; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Subjects "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" With Study Treatment Using the Subject Satisfaction Scale at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Weeks After Re-treatment. |
113; 33; 108; 27; 67; 16 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the "Satisfaction With Lips" FACE-Q | Aesthetics© Scale Questionnaire at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Week After Re-treatment. |
50.6; 46.1; 40.9; 31.8; 36.2; 25.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the "Satisfaction With Outcome" FACE-Q | Aesthetics© Scale Questionnaire at Weeks 12, 36, 52 After Last Treatment and 4 Week After Re-treatment. |
77.2; 71.1; 73.8; 61.9; 75.6; 61.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Subjects Scored Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Scale by the BLE. |
134; 41; 113; 29; 58; 11 | — |
Summary
This is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, prospective, controlled clinical study to identify whether RHA® 3 is non-inferior to Restylane-L® for lip augmentation at Week 12 after the last treatment (initial or touch-up).
At screening, the treating investigator (TI) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the validated Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale (5-grade) for eligibility of the subject for the study.
At screening, the blinded live evaluator (BLE) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the TLFS to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessment of effectiveness.
Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to either the RHA® 3 or the Restylane-L® treatment group. Subjects will be blinded to the study treatment. The TI will administer the fillers, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment 4 weeks after the initial treatment to optimize the results. If the touch-up treatment is administered, the subject will be asked to come to the site for an additional visit 4 weeks after the touch-up injection.
The study duration was extended from 36 to 52 weeks once all subjects had already been enrolled. Nearly 60% of the subjects consented to extend the study to 52 weeks before being eligible for repeat treatment. All data are presented up to 52 weeks (as well as 4 more weeks follow-up after retreatment at 36 or 52 weeks).
Subjects will be followed for 36 to 52 weeks after their last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up), at which point, they will be offered re-treatment with RHA® 3, regardless of their original treatment, provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees. Reasons for not administering the re-treatment will be documented.
The subject will then be followed for an additional 4 weeks before exiting the study. If the subject or the TI declines re-treatment, this visit (36 or 52 weeks after the last treatment) will be considered the study Exit visit.
For subjects with re-treatment, the Exit visit will be 4 weeks after the re-treatment.
The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at each study visit (up to 36 weeks or 52 (if applicable) weeks after the last treatment, and 4 weeks after re treatment) or until all treatment-related ongoing adverse events (AEs) have resolved or resolved with sequelae as per TI judgment or if follow-up is no longer possible.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older
- Lip fullness of grade 1 to 3 on the TLFS (ranging from 1 to 5) who desire at least 1 point of correction for upper and/or lower lips OR has Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI and has lip fullness grade 4 or 5 on the TLFS who desire treatment to the vermillion body for upper and/or lower lips. The BLE and TI must independently assess and agree that this criterion is met; however, concordance of fullness is not required. If the assessments of the TI and the BLE are the same or differ by exactly 1 point on the scale, this difference is considered acceptable. If the assessments differ by 2 points or more on the scale, the subject will not be eligible.
- Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
- Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
- Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form and the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form prior to any study- related procedures being performed.
Exclusion Criteria
- Female subjects that are pregnant, breast-feeding or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control
- Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices
- Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months
- Has a history of or currently has an auto-immune disease.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04540913). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.