N/A
N=86
Caudal Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration for Inguinal Procedures
Anesthesia, Caudal
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04590027 ↗Enrolled (actual)
86
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Comparison of Analgesia Quality Between the Two Groups — 1.86; 3.09; 1.83; 2.95 score on a scale — p=<0.05
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- —
- Age
- Pediatric · 0+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University Hospital Tuebingen
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Comparison of Analgesia Quality Between the Two Groups |
1.86; 3.09; 1.83; 2.95; 1.36; 2.13 | <0.05 sig |
| SECONDARY Set up Time |
22.5; 17 | <0.05 sig |
| SECONDARY Rescue Medication |
58; 31 | — |
| SECONDARY Neurological Outcome |
— | — |
Summary
Single-centre observational study to analyse whether there is a difference in post-operative pain scores and set up time when comparing caudal block with local wound infiltration
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
-
Exclusion Criteria
- no return of questionnaire
- parents do not understand language
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04590027). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.