Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=27 Diagnostic

Comparative Study of MCCE With/Without Tether vs Conventional Upper Endoscopy in Patients With Upper Abdominal Symptoms

Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Compare Total Number of Lesions Identified Via MCCE Versus EGD — 10; 12 # of lesions identified

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
MCC/MCC-T (Device); Standard gastroscopy (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
AnX Robotica Corp.
Primary completion
Jun 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Compare Total Number of Lesions Identified Via MCCE Versus EGD
10; 12
PRIMARY
Number of Adverse Events
1; 2
SECONDARY
Participant Satisfaction Score With MCCE Procedure Versus EGD Procedure
8.13; 7.56
SECONDARY
To Compare Rate of Complete Examination for the MCC and EGD Procedures
16; 16

Summary

A prospective single blinded, tandem study, comparing a magnetically controlled capsule with or without a tether (MCC or MCC-T) with conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of patients with upper abdominal symptoms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient is able to provide informed consent
  • Patient has appropriate indications for EGD including symptoms of, but not limited to upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, heartburn, iron deficiency anemia, weight loss, bloating, belching, nausea, vomiting and atypical chest pain.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient with dysphagia.
  • Patient with previous intestinal surgery.
  • Patient with Crohn's disease or other potential obstructive conditions, unless there is a recent CTE, MRE or patency capsule performed to exclude an obstructive lesion that may retain the capsule.
  • Female patient who is pregnant.
  • Patient with implanted medical device that would be potentially affected by magnets or radiofrequency emissions (e.g., pacemakers, implanted cardiac defibrillators).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04605302). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search