Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=234 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative Colitis

Enrolled (actual)
234
Serious AEs
4.7%
Results posted
Jul 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS) — 26.0; 18.3 Percentage of participants — p=0.2524

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Etrasimod (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Pfizer
Primary completion
Jun 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)
26.0; 18.3 0.2524
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMS
28.3; 11.7 0.0068 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52
32.3; 23.3 0.2302
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 52
37.0; 30.0 0.3339
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 52
20.5; 20.0 0.9141
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 52
25.2; 15.0 0.1089
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMS
16.5; 5.0 0.0104 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS
16.2; 16.7 0.9203
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS
25.2; 16.7 0.1726
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS
30.0; 30.0 0.9272
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS
25.2; 16.7 0.1726
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMS
55.9; 36.7 0.0151 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMS
44.1; 38.3 0.4419
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12
44.1; 20.0 0.0007 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 12
29.1; 13.3 0.0128 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 12
36.2; 25.0 0.1492
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 12
20.5; 20.0 0.9774
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 12
44.9; 21.7 0.0011 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 12
44.9; 33.3 0.1513
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 12
46.5; 35.0 0.1823

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis in adult participants.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) ≥ 3 months prior to screening
  • Active UC confirmed by endoscopy
  • Moderately active UC defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 to 6 and an endoscopic score ≥ 2 and rectal bleeding score ≥ 1
  • Received a surveillance colonoscopy within 12 months before baseline

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe extensive colitis
  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with Crohn's disease
  • Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis
  • Hospitalization for exacerbation of UC requiring intravenous steroids within 12 weeks prior to or after screening
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04607837). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search