Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=35 Randomized Treatment

Retention of Nasoenteric Feeding Tubes in Pediatric Patients Using a Nasal Bridle

Feeding Tube Complication
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04621734 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
35
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2023
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Tube Dislodgements Per 10 Tube Days. — 0.16; 2.11 Dislodgements

Summary

A study to compare tube dislodgment rates when a nasoenteric feeding tube is secured with adhesive tape vs the AMT BridlePro device.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Tube Dislodgements Per 10 Tube Days.
0.16; 2.11

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Need for nasoenteric feeding
  • Admitted to University Hospital
  • Age 0-18 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • Facial trauma
  • Nasal airway obstructions
  • Thrombocytopenia (<100 K/μL)
  • s/p septoplasty
  • Patients with vomer bone graft
  • Nasoenteric feeding tube placed and secured prior to being screened for study
  • Contraindication for the use of the BridlePro
  • Does not meet inclusion criteria
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04621734). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search