Phase 2
N=33
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Elective Hepatic Surgery
Hemostasis · General Surgery
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04660721 ↗Enrolled (actual)
33
Serious AEs
33.3%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ... — 179; 168; 0; 0 number of TEAEs
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Interventions
- sFilm-FS (Combination_product); TACHOSIL® (Combination_product)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Sealantium Medical Ltd.
- Primary completion
- May 2023
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ... |
179; 168; 0; 0; 1; 1 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs |
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through Physical Examinations |
6; 7; 3; 5; 6; 5 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values |
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Detection of Antibodies Against Fibrinogen. |
2; 2 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs |
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs |
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs |
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs |
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values |
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values |
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| PRIMARY To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles |
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0 | — |
| SECONDARY To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Proportion of Patients Achieving Hemostasis at TBS |
11; 0; 12; 12; 12; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Incidence of Re-treatment at the TBS |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Percentage of Total Patients That Have Achieved Hemostasis |
14; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through Incidence of Treatment Failure |
2; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure. |
1; 1 | — |
Summary
The Study investigates a new product, sFilm-FS, aimed to help controlling body fluid leakage in general surgery procedures, proposing its use as an adjunct to hemostasis and/or sealing.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients (males or females) aged ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients requiring elective open hepatic surgery.
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL within 24 hours prior to surgical procedure.
- Patients understanding the nature of the study and providing their informed consent prior to participation.
- Patients willing to participate in the study and able to attend the visits and procedures foreseen by study protocol.
Intra-operative inclusion criteria:
- Patients with a target bleeding site (TBS) identified by the Investigator during hepatic surgery (intra-operative inclusion criteria).
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients having undergone a therapeutic surgical procedure within 30 days from the study enrolment.
- Patients with a severe coagulopathy defined as INR > 2.0.
- Patients with platelet count <50, 000 x109 PLT/L at the screening.
- Patients admitted to trauma surgery.
- Transplant patients due to fulminant hepatic failure.
- Patients with known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to blood products or to one of the components of sFilm-FS or the active-comparator.
- Patients with anesthesia risk judged to be higher than ASA3 by the Investigator.
- Patients with at least one of the following concomitant conditions: severe co-morbid conditions known to pose a high risk for surgery and adequate recovery (i.e., liver cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score B or C, cholestasis, heart diseases), immunodeficiency diseases, blood clotting disorders, any conditions known to effect wound healing (i.e., collagen vascular disease), known or current alcohol or drug abusers.
- Patients suffering from claustrophobia.
- Patients with implanted or embedded metal objects, prostheses, pacemaker, or fragments in the head or body that would present a risk during the MRI scanning procedure or have worked with ferrous metals either as a vocation or hobby or following trauma (i.e., sheet metal workers, welders, or machinists) in such a way that might have led to unknown, indwelling metal fragments that could cause injury if they moved in response to placement in the magnetic field.
- Patients being treated with at least one of the following treatments: antibiotic therapy for active infection, fibrin sealants, systemic steroids, or immunosuppressive agents.
- Patients who are participating or have participated in other clinical studies within the 30 days before the study enrolment.
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding or who wish to become pregnant during the period of the clinical study and for three months later.
- Female patients of childbearing age (less than 24 months after the last menstrual cycle) who do not use adequate contraception.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria:
- Patients identified with a TBS with major arterial bleeding requiring suture or mechanical ligation.
- Patients identified by the Investigator to have intra-operative bleeding from large defects in large arteries or veins, requiring repair.
- Patients identified by the Investigator to have intra-operative findings that may preclude conduct of study procedure.
- Patients having an active local infection in the anatomic surgical area.
- Patients with occurrence of major intra-operative complications that require resuscitation or deviation from the planned surgical procedure.
- Patients with bleeding site in or near to foramina in bone.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04660721). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.