Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=33 Randomized Treatment

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Elective Hepatic Surgery

Hemostasis · General Surgery

Enrolled (actual)
33
Serious AEs
33.3%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ... — 179; 168; 0; 0 number of TEAEs

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
sFilm-FS (Combination_product); TACHOSIL® (Combination_product)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sealantium Medical Ltd.
Primary completion
May 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ...
179; 168; 0; 0; 1; 1
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through Physical Examinations
6; 7; 3; 5; 6; 5
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Detection of Antibodies Against Fibrinogen.
2; 2
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
36.5; 36.7; 36.6; 36.4; 36.4; 36.3
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
6; 4; 1; 0; 5; 4
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
PRIMARY
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
73.2; 73.0; 71.1; 74.9; 56.6; 62.0
SECONDARY
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Proportion of Patients Achieving Hemostasis at TBS
11; 0; 12; 12; 12; 12
SECONDARY
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Incidence of Re-treatment at the TBS
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Percentage of Total Patients That Have Achieved Hemostasis
14; 12
SECONDARY
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through Incidence of Treatment Failure
2; 0
SECONDARY
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure.
1; 1

Summary

The Study investigates a new product, sFilm-FS, aimed to help controlling body fluid leakage in general surgery procedures, proposing its use as an adjunct to hemostasis and/or sealing.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients (males or females) aged ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients requiring elective open hepatic surgery.
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL within 24 hours prior to surgical procedure.
  • Patients understanding the nature of the study and providing their informed consent prior to participation.
  • Patients willing to participate in the study and able to attend the visits and procedures foreseen by study protocol.

Intra-operative inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with a target bleeding site (TBS) identified by the Investigator during hepatic surgery (intra-operative inclusion criteria).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients having undergone a therapeutic surgical procedure within 30 days from the study enrolment.
  • Patients with a severe coagulopathy defined as INR > 2.0.
  • Patients with platelet count <50, 000 x109 PLT/L at the screening.
  • Patients admitted to trauma surgery.
  • Transplant patients due to fulminant hepatic failure.
  • Patients with known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to blood products or to one of the components of sFilm-FS or the active-comparator.
  • Patients with anesthesia risk judged to be higher than ASA3 by the Investigator.
  • Patients with at least one of the following concomitant conditions: severe co-morbid conditions known to pose a high risk for surgery and adequate recovery (i.e., liver cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score B or C, cholestasis, heart diseases), immunodeficiency diseases, blood clotting disorders, any conditions known to effect wound healing (i.e., collagen vascular disease), known or current alcohol or drug abusers.
  • Patients suffering from claustrophobia.
  • Patients with implanted or embedded metal objects, prostheses, pacemaker, or fragments in the head or body that would present a risk during the MRI scanning procedure or have worked with ferrous metals either as a vocation or hobby or following trauma (i.e., sheet metal workers, welders, or machinists) in such a way that might have led to unknown, indwelling metal fragments that could cause injury if they moved in response to placement in the magnetic field.
  • Patients being treated with at least one of the following treatments: antibiotic therapy for active infection, fibrin sealants, systemic steroids, or immunosuppressive agents.
  • Patients who are participating or have participated in other clinical studies within the 30 days before the study enrolment.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding or who wish to become pregnant during the period of the clinical study and for three months later.
  • Female patients of childbearing age (less than 24 months after the last menstrual cycle) who do not use adequate contraception.

Intra-operative exclusion criteria:

  • Patients identified with a TBS with major arterial bleeding requiring suture or mechanical ligation.
  • Patients identified by the Investigator to have intra-operative bleeding from large defects in large arteries or veins, requiring repair.
  • Patients identified by the Investigator to have intra-operative findings that may preclude conduct of study procedure.
  • Patients having an active local infection in the anatomic surgical area.
  • Patients with occurrence of major intra-operative complications that require resuscitation or deviation from the planned surgical procedure.
  • Patients with bleeding site in or near to foramina in bone.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04660721). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search