Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=10 Basic Science

N-of-few Study of Pain Perception

Healthy

Enrolled (actual)
10
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Within Participant Subjective Ratings of Acute Thermal Pain Following High Compared to Low Cues (Learned Via Symbolic Learning) — 7.32 score on a scale — p=0.043

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Symbolic conditioning (Behavioral); Conditioning (Behavioral); Instructions (Behavioral); Counterfactual (Behavioral)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Trustees of Dartmouth College
Primary completion
May 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Within Participant Subjective Ratings of Acute Thermal Pain Following High Compared to Low Cues (Learned Via Symbolic Learning)
7.32 0.043 sig
PRIMARY
Within Participant Subjective Ratings of Acute Thermal Pain Following High Compared to Low Cues (Learned Via Conditioning)
13.21 0.036 sig
PRIMARY
Within Participant Subjective Ratings of Acute Thermal Pain Following High Compared to Low Cues (Learned Via Instructions Only)
13.76 0.012 sig
PRIMARY
Within Participant Subjective Ratings of Acute Thermal Pain, When it is the Worse vs. the Better Alternative
-2.06 0.835

Summary

A behavioral study that will examine how pain perception is affected by different types of conditioning and by context, with a few participants and multiple sessions ("N-of-few" design).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy participants

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cannot tolerate heat pain applied to the forearm/leg, based on a calibration task at the beginning of the experiment
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04664400). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search