Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=270 Randomized Other

Comparison of Different Techniques on First Attempt Success in Difficult Vascular Access Patients

Vascular Access

Enrolled (actual)
270
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt — 56; 71; 53 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Ultrasound group (Device); Near Infrared Device Group (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Ege University
Primary completion
Feb 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt
56; 71; 53
SECONDARY
Procedure Time.
72; 107; 82
SECONDARY
Patients Who Need Rescue Methods
17; 17; 25
SECONDARY
Number of Attempts
1; 1; 1

Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any difference between the use of standard techniques, ultrasonography and infra-red light for the success of the first attempt in difficult peripheral vascular access patients. Patients who have difficult vascular access history ( often need 2 or more attempt to access peripheral intravenous catheter), who do not have palpable or visible vein after tourniquet, and who have the hard anticipation according to operator ( easy-moderate-hard) are included to study. The primary objective is planned as the determination of the success rate in the first attempt. Secondary aims of the study were determined as: total procedure time,total number of attempts, and need for rescue procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have previously described a history of difficult vascular access.
  • Patients who do not have palpable or visible veins after tourniquet placement or who have been referred to unusual locations due to the lack of appropriate veins in the upper extremity.
  • Patients who are expected to be hard to perform the procedure by the senior nurse.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The patients who do not need vascular access.
  • Patients who do not give consent
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who are under 18 years old
  • Patients who require immediate intervention due to any life-threatening condition.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04821362). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search