Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=75 Randomized Basic Science

Neural Mechanisms of Enhancing Emotion Regulation in Bereaved Spouses

Affect · Bereavement · Emotions · Depressive Symptoms · Grief

Enrolled (actual)
75
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Self-reported Negative Affect — 1.88; 1.91; 1.70; 1.89 score on a scale — p=0.053

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bryan Denny
Primary completion
May 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Self-reported Negative Affect
1.88; 1.91; 1.70; 1.89; 1.63; 1.85 0.053
PRIMARY
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia
2.80; 2.72; 2.90; 2.95; 3.05; 2.84 0.741
PRIMARY
Neural Activity
0.09; 0.10; 0.13; 0.14; 0.11; 0.13 0.021 sig
PRIMARY
Grief Rumination
10.38; 11.69; 5.66; 5.78; 6.66; 6.81 0.724
PRIMARY
Depressive Symptoms
21.59; 21.78; 18.96; 20.75; 16.77; 18.70 0.092
PRIMARY
Perceived Stress
16.07; 15.31; 15.93; 15.53; 14.52; 14.28 0.585
SECONDARY
Frequency of Reappraisal Usage
29.86; 30.03; 31.48; 31.69; 32.17; 31.43 0.70
SECONDARY
Physical Health
77.93; 83.71; 59.48; 67.74; 51.72; 46.24 0.696
SECONDARY
Inflammatory Biomarkers
16.60; 12.60; 5.10; 10.34; 21.02; 33.53 0.422

Summary

This study investigates the underlying mechanisms of a novel emotion regulation intervention among recently bereaved spouses. More specifically, this study examines how thinking about an emotional stimulus in a more adaptive way can affect the relationship between psychological stress, psychophysiological biomarkers of adaptive cardiac response, and brain activity. The emotion regulation strategy targeted is reappraisal, specifically reappraisal-by-distancing (i.e., thinking about a negative situation in a more objective, impartial way) versus reappraisal-by-reinterpretation (i.e., thinking about a better outcome for a negative situation than what initially seemed apparent). The study seeks to determine if relatively brief, focused reappraisal training in bereaved spouses will result in reduction of self-reported negative affect, increases in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; a measure of heart rate variability reflecting adaptive cardiac vagal tone), reduction in blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, and changes in neural activity over time. Reappraisal-by-distancing is expected to lead to greater changes in these variables relative to reappraisal-by-reinterpretation. Additionally, it is expected that across time decreases in self-reported negative affect, increases in RSA, reductions in blood-based inflammatory biomarker levels, and changes in neural activity will in turn lead to reductions in depressive symptoms and grief rumination. Finally, it is expected that distancing training will lead to reductions in depressive symptoms and grief rumination that are mediated by changes in the targeted neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Recent loss of romantic partner within the past 5-7 months
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Minimum score of 25 on the Inventory for Complicated Grief
  • Must be able to speak, read, and write in English
  • Must be eligible to safely complete MRI scanning

Exclusion Criteria

  • Death of a second close family member/friend in the past year
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy
  • Diagnosed with obstructive pulmonary and/or heart disease, diabetes, liver failure, or kidney failure
  • Significant visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment
  • Divorced within the last year
  • Prior participation in a similar emotion regulation training protocol in Dr. Denny's lab
  • Any contraindication of MRI scanning (e.g., pregnancy, presence of any non-removable metal on or in the body, implanted medical devices, tattoos, medication patches, orthodontic braces or permanent retainers, hearing aids, history of claustrophobia or breathing disorders)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04822194). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search