Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=110 Randomized Other

Comparison of Different Ventilator and Vaporizer Technologies to Study Economic and Environmental Implications

Anesthetic Gas Consumption and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrolled (actual)
110
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Primary Study Variable: Amount of Gas Vaporized Anesthetic Per Minute Anesthesia — 95.48; 119.3 grams/minute

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
ICU certified ventilator (Device); Non-ICU certified ventilator (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of California, Irvine
Primary completion
Nov 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Primary Study Variable: Amount of Gas Vaporized Anesthetic Per Minute Anesthesia
95.48; 119.3
SECONDARY
Time to Reach Aldrete > 8
98.13; 89.18
SECONDARY
Time to Extubation From Weaning
10.37; 10.78

Summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether or not the use of a low volume ventilator in an anesthesia machine reduces anesthetic costs significantly as compared to other high volume machines. The study will compare the a low-flow anesthesia machine to a traditional anesthesia machine during routine elective general surgery in patients with ASA ratings of 1-2 under general anesthesia receiving standard care.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Undergo surgery under general anesthesia in UCI Medical Center
  • Agree to sign the consent and HIPAA forms
  • Subjects who are able to receive sevoflurane

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects under the age of 18
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30
  • ASA > 2
  • Pregnant females
  • Procedures less than 2 hours
  • Those with known sensitivity to sevoflurane or other halogenated agents; those with known or suspected susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia
  • Severe Cardiovascular Disease: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04851314). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search