Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,507

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Maintenance Treatment Patterns in China

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Enrolled (actual)
1,507
Serious AEs
0.7%
Results posted
Dec 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline — 735; 68; 554; 105 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Prospective observational cohort study (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Nov 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
735; 68; 554; 105; 3; 13
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
685; 57; 433; 95; 6; 26
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
17; 3; 0; 1; 3; 2
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
537; 29; 0; 63; 131; 196
SECONDARY
Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) at Baseline
1.424; 1.405; 1.137
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
13; 15; 0; 36; 11; 26
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
523; 38; 476; 75; 0; 15
SECONDARY
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
12.4; 19.5; 27.0; 13.1; 16.8; 18.7
SECONDARY
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
1.2; 2.1; 2.0; 1.4; 1.8; 2.0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization by Their Each Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) Risk Group
503; 49; 5; 58
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With at Least One Co-morbidity
512; 52; 571
SECONDARY
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
38; 1; 40; 219; 27; 187
SECONDARY
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
300; 20; 109; 318; 32; 250
SECONDARY
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
127; 14; 37; 279; 17; 130
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
67; 4; 180; 26; 1; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
92; 6; 20; 127; 12; 35

Summary

This observational study will be conducted in COPD participants in Tier 2 and 3 hospitals in China to gain an understanding of the complex COPD management and physician's treatment strategy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants with minimum 40 years of age.
  • A diagnosis of COPD confirmed by spirometry (According to Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease [GOLD] 2019 criteria) in Tier 2 and Tier 3 hospitals.
  • In hospitalized participants, recruit only participants who receive any intravenous therapy.
  • A signed and dated written informed consent.
  • Participants can communicate normally.

Exclusion criteria

  • Current primary diagnosis of asthma, active tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, lung cancer or other active pulmonary disease.
  • Other unstable diseases or cognitive behavior, which could influence CAT and lung function results (judged by physicians).
  • Experienced a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation treated by a physician within last 1 month.
  • Currently participating in another COPD clinical study, which provides the participant investigational medication and/or disease management.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04853238). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search