Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=146 Randomized Single-blind Supportive Care

Virtual Reality as a Substitute for Procedural Sedation During Epidural Steroid Injections

Lower Back Pain · Lumbar Radiculopathy

Enrolled (actual)
146
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Score During Procedure — 3.7; 3.2; 5.2 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Virtual reality (Device); Intravenous sedation (Drug); Standard care (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Primary completion
Aug 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Score During Procedure
3.7; 3.2; 5.2
SECONDARY
Amount of Local Anesthetic Required
5.6; 5.4; 6.3
SECONDARY
Subcutaneous Skin Wheal Pain Score
4.0; 3.8; 4.5
SECONDARY
Procedure Satisfaction
4.7; 4.6; 4.5
SECONDARY
Ability to Communicate
4.1; 3.7; 4.0
SECONDARY
Procedure-related Anxiety
4.0; 4.2; 3.8
SECONDARY
Time to Discharge From Postanesthetic Care Unit
27.0; 38.8; 24.4
SECONDARY
Participants With Positive Categorical Outcome
25; 25; 24
SECONDARY
Average Leg Pain Score
3.0; 3.1; 3.8
SECONDARY
Worst Leg Pain Score
4.9; 4.8; 5.8
SECONDARY
Average Back Pain Score
3.1; 3.5; 3.6
SECONDARY
Worst Back Pain Score
5.1; 5.5; 5.5
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
4.7; 4.5; 4.6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Analgesic Reduction
16; 19; 7
SECONDARY
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score
32; 36; 34
SECONDARY
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Scores for Anxiety and Depressions
4.9; 5.1; 4.3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Complications
5; 10; 4
SECONDARY
Percentage Change of the Spectral Edge Frequency (SEF)
0.56; 64.05; 53.43
SECONDARY
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Scores for Depression and Anxiety
4.0; 4.5; 3.8

Summary

This study examines the impact of virtual reality compared to sedation (midazolam and/or fentanyl) and no intervention on pain experienced from an epidural steroid injection (ESI). The intervention group (who receive virtual reality as a distraction modality) is compared to a sedation group and a control group.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and females; ages 18-90 years
  • Lumbosacral radicular pain with a baseline average of leg pain score of > 4/10, MRI findings (if available) consistent with symptoms, duration of pain > 6 weeks, and no previous lumbar spine surgery.
  • Documented diagnosis of radicular pain caused by herniated disc, central stenosis, foraminal stenosis, degenerative disk disease
  • Willingness to adhere to undergo ESI with either sedation (midazolam and or fentanyl) or with virtual reality
  • Able to appear for a follow up visit between 24-40 days following the intervention

Exclusion Criteria

  • MRI findings discordant with symptoms (absence of herniated disc, spinal stenosis or severe disc degeneration without nerve root impingement (e.g. annular tears) that could explain symptoms)
  • Previous lumbosacral spine surgery at the area affected
  • Prior ESI within the past 6 months
  • Allergy to contrast dye
  • Poorly controlled psychiatric conditions that could affect outcomes (e.g. active substance abuse) or impose a barrier to participation (e.g. anxiety disorder requiring procedural sedation)
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04887285). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search