Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=37 Randomized Single-blind Other

Satisfaction With an In-house Developed Nasal Foreign Body Removal Manikin

Satisfaction · Consumer Satisfaction
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04901026 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
37
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Satisfaction Scores — 4; 4; 4; 4 score on a scale

Summary

To overcome the issues regarding training in real persons, using a simulated manikin instead of an actual patient or simulated patient is another option with consideration to the training able to be held at any time periods and no issues about minor or serious complications needed to be concerned with. The aim of this study is to devise a low-cost manikin with a specific design to serve all possible needs of end users but still keep its function as necessary for training.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Satisfaction Scores
4; 4; 4; 4; 5; 4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Physicians who hold a MD degree

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not want to complete questionnaires
  • No experience in a nasal foreign body removal
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04901026). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search