N/A
Completed N=160
Standard Versus Flexible Tip Bougie for Videolaryngoscopy
Intubation, Intratracheal
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04973176 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
160
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale Score (mIDS) — 1; 0 score on a scale range of 0 to 10 number
Summary
This study aims to compare the flexible tip bougie with standard bougie for tracheal intubation using non channelled, acute angled video laryngoscope using modified intubation difficulty scale score as primary outcome.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale Score (mIDS) |
1; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Time to Successful Tracheal Intubation |
42.9; 41.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Laryngoscopy Time |
5; 4.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Overall First Attempt Success Rate |
79; 80 | — |
| SECONDARY Anaesthetist's Visual Analogue Score for Ease of Use of the Bougie |
— | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients aged above 18, presenting for elective surgical procedures and requiring general anaesthesia tracheal intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who are do not want to take part or do not give consent
- Patients below 18 years of age
- Patient physical status of ASA 4 and 5,
- Patients deemed to require awake intubation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04973176). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.