N/A
N=147
Comparison of Effectiveness of Mask Ventilation and Endotracheal Tube in Pharynx (TTIP) in Patients With Potential Difficult Airway
Ventilation Therapy; Complications
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05005390 ↗Enrolled (actual)
147
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Patients With Successful Ventilation — 127; 115 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- TTIP ventilation (Device); Mask Ventilation (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Primary completion
- Nov 2022
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Patients With Successful Ventilation |
127; 115 | — |
| SECONDARY Expired Tidal Volume of Ventilation |
618.22; 719.48 | — |
| SECONDARY Peak Inspiratory Airway Pressure Achieved |
19.82; 19.94 | — |
| SECONDARY Dynamic Airway Resistance |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Satisfaction of the Providers Obtained With Post Ventilation Survey |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Satisfaction of the Providers Obtained With Post Ventilation Survey |
— | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of TTIP-first ventilation and to compare the efficacy of TTIP first ventilation with the current practice of mask-first ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- BMI >30 kg/m2
- Mallampati class III or IV
- Requiring general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
- Acute and chronic respiratory disorders, including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)and asthma
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)physical status classification ≥IV
- Emergency surgery
- Induction requiring rapid sequence for intubation
- Patients requiring awake intubation
- Pregnant women
- Untreated ischemic heart disease
- Contraindication for mask ventilation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05005390). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.