Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=60 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Pain Catheters Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis, Knee
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05053087 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Post-operative Pain Levels — 5.1; 5.1; 6.1 score on a scale
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

The purpose of this research is to study how well the adductor canal pain catheters works after a total knee arthroplasty or replacement of the knee joint. The catheter works by using either an intermittent bolus injection to provide a large dose of medication or continuous infusion of pain medicine, ropivacaine 0.2%, compared to a single-shot adductor canal block.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Post-operative Pain Levels
5.1; 5.1; 6.1
SECONDARY
Amount of Medication Administered
138; 111; 144
SECONDARY
Duration of Narcotic Used
21; 14; 14

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 90 years.
  • Willing to participate in the study and competent to provide informed consent.
  • Willing to comply with protocol procedures.
  • Has an underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis indicated for a total knee arthroplasty.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The patient must not have taken any narcotic medications (schedule II) during the 3 months leading up to the surgery.
  • The patient must not be allergic or intolerant to a medication used in the multimodal pain pathway.
  • Revision knee arthroplasty.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes with A1C > 8.0%.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05053087). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search