Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=80 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening

Induced; Birth

Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Bishop Score — 3.0; 3.0 score on a scale — p=0.91

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Dilapan-S (Device); Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon (Device)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Primary completion
Jul 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Bishop Score
3.0; 3.0 0.91
SECONDARY
Patient Satisfaction
9; 8 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Mode of Delivery: Vaginal Delivery, Cesarean Delivery
30; 30; 10; 10 1.0
SECONDARY
Time on Labor and Delivery
20.1; 17.0 0.89
SECONDARY
Maternal Length of Stay
3.2; 2.9 0.98
SECONDARY
Cervical Ripening Success Score: No Failure, Failure
33; 25; 7; 15 0.045 sig
SECONDARY
Composite Maternal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity
8; 8; 32; 32 1
SECONDARY
Composite Neonatal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity
1; 0; 39; 40 1

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare Cook balloon and Dilapan-S for outpatient cervical ripening to see if Dilapan-S is non-inferior in increasing Bishop score compared to the Cook balloon.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18-50 years of age
  • Term (37-41 6/7 weeks gestational age)
  • Low risk (i.e. without any maternal or fetal co-morbidity) and who are candidates for outpatient cervical ripening per the Brigham and Women's outpatient cervical ripening protocol
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior cesarean section
  • Any contraindication to outpatient cervical ripening per Brigham and Women's outpatient cervical ripening protocol
  • Non-English-speaking
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05062343). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search