N/A
Completed N=20
Piloting a Motivational Interviewing Shame-Resilience Training
Shame
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05106959 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Willingness to Communicate — 3.3 score on a scale
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the shame resilience theory in a pilot context to assess its feasibility in a potential full scale clinical trial. Shame resilience was developed through qualitative methods but currently has little quantitative backing. Continued research is needed to assess shame-resilience as a potential intervention for shame which little is known to combat prevalent negative health outcomes associated with shame.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Willingness to Communicate |
3.3 | — |
| PRIMARY Adult Trauma Symptom Checklist |
.913 | — |
| PRIMARY Shame Compass |
1.54 | — |
| PRIMARY WHO Big 5 Subjective Well-Being |
15.26 | — |
| PRIMARY Shame Resilience Amongst Mental Health Trainees |
1.83 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Study participants will be Milagro patients
- Engaged in medication assisted treatment
- At least 18 years of age
- Can read and speak English
- Are willing to be contacted for follow-up \
- Are not incarcerated
- Are within the first or second trimester of pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria
- The study will not enroll non-English speaking Milagro patients
- Patients with obvious cognitive impairments
- Patients with the inability to provide informed consent.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05106959). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.