Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=360 Randomized Treatment

NHFOV as Primary Support in Very Preterm Infants With RDS

to Test the Hypothesis That NHFOV is More Effective Than nCPAP in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Verypreterm Neonates
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05141435 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
360
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Treatment Failure Within 72 Hours After Randomization 72 Hours After Randomization Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation — 48; 27 Participants

Summary

This will be a prospective, multi-center, two-arms,parallel, randomized, controlled trial with a superiority design,conducted in China. The investigators conduct this multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial to test the hypothesis that NHFOV is more effective than nCPAP in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in infants with a gestational age of less than 28 weeks when used as a primary noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mode.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Treatment Failure Within 72 Hours After Randomization 72 Hours After Randomization Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
48; 27
SECONDARY
Rate of Airleaks(Pneumothorax and/or Pneumomediastinum) Occurred During Noninvasive Respiratory Support
4; 1

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

(1) Gestational age between 240/7 and 286/7 weeks; (2) diagnosis of RDS. The diagnosis of RDS will be based on clinical manifestations (tachypnea, nasal flaring and or grunting) and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) greater than 0.25 for target saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) 89% to 94%;(3) Age less than 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria

  • Intubated forany reasons at birth
  • Major congenital malformations or known complex congenital heart disease
  • No parental consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05141435). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search