N/A
N=110
Diagnostic Accuracy of Handheld vs Traditional Ultrasound
Image, Body
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05196776 ↗Enrolled (actual)
110
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Diagnostic Accuracy — 53; 56 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Portable, handheld point-of-care ultrasound device (Device); Cart-based point-of-care ultrasound device (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Temple University
- Primary completion
- Mar 2022
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Diagnostic Accuracy |
53; 56 | — |
| SECONDARY Image Quality by Expert Review |
4; 5 | — |
Summary
Patients receiving a point-of-care ultrasound will be randomized into a portable, handheld device or a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine to compare diagnostic capability.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- English and Spanish-speaking patients, who require a gallbladder, cardiac, renal, aorta, or lung ultrasound based on the discretion of the treating physician.
Exclusion Criteria
- All other non-English and non-Spanish speaking patients
- Vulnerable groups
- Patients unable to consent
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05196776). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.