Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=123 Randomized Prevention

Me & You-Tech: A Socio-Ecological Solution to Teen Dating Violence for the Digital Age

Adolescent Behavior · Interpersonal Relations · Domestic Violence · Physical Violence

Enrolled (actual)
123
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Any Type of Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) — 12; 15; 26; 59 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Me & You - Tech (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric · 11+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Primary completion
Dec 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Any Type of Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI)
4; 9; 22; 37
PRIMARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Any Type of Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI)
4; 9; 22; 37
PRIMARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Any Type of Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI)
3; 5; 23; 40
PRIMARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Any Type of Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI)
3; 5; 23; 40
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Psychological Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Psychological Perpetration Subscale
1; 4; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Psychological Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Psychological Perpetration Subscale
1; 4; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Psychological Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Psychological Victimization Subscale
2; 5; 24; 40
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Psychological Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Psychological Victimization Subscale
2; 5; 24; 40
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Physical Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Physical Perpetration Subscale
1; 4; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Physical Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Physical Perpetration Subscale
1; 4; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Physical Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Physical Victimization Subscale
0; 3; 26; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Physical Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Physical Victimization Subscale
0; 3; 26; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Sexual Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Sexual Perpetration Subscale
0; 0; 26; 46
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Sexual Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Sexual Perpetration Subscale
0; 0; 26; 46
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Sexual Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Sexual Victimization Subscale
0; 1; 26; 44
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Sexual Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Sexual Victimization Subscale
0; 1; 26; 44
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Digital Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by a Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire - Perpetrator Subscale
9; 12; 29; 63
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Digital Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire - Perpetrator Subscale
4; 8; 22; 37
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Digital Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire - Victimization Subscale
1; 3; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Digital Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire - Victimization Subscale
1; 3; 25; 42
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Perpetrated Threatening Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Threatening Perpetration Subscale
1; 2; 37; 73
SECONDARY
Number Youth Who Perpetrated Threatening Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Threatening Perpetration Subscale
0; 3; 26; 43
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Threatening Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Threatening Victimization Subscale
1; 2; 25; 43
SECONDARY
Number of Youth Who Were Victimized by Threatening Teen Dating Violence as Assessed by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - Threatening Victimization Subscale
1; 2; 25; 43
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey - Boys Aggressing Girls Subscale
1.68; 1.41
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey - Boys Aggressing Girls Subscale
1.68; 1.41
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey - Boys Aggressing Girls Subscale
1.68; 1.41
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey- Girls Aggressing Boys Subscale
1.83; 1.67
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey- Girls Aggressing Boys Subscale
1.83; 1.67
SECONDARY
Student Norms Toward Violence for Girls as Assessed by the Acceptance of Dating Abuse Survey - Girls Aggressing Boy Subscale
1.70; 1.57
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Constructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.35; 1.41
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Constructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.35; 1.41
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Constructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.35; 1.41
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Destructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.00; 0.80
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Destructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.00; 0.80
SECONDARY
Conflict Resolution Skills as Assessed by the Destructive Conflict Resolution Skill Subscale
1.00; 0.80
SECONDARY
Attitudes Towards Sexting as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.15; 1.37
SECONDARY
Attitudes Towards Sexting as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.15; 1.37
SECONDARY
Attitudes Towards Sexting as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.15; 1.37
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
0.73; 1.78
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
0.73; 1.78
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
0.73; 1.78
SECONDARY
Perceived Frequency of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
1.73; 1.82
SECONDARY
Perceived Frequency of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
1.73; 1.82
SECONDARY
Perceived Frequency of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
1.73; 1.82
SECONDARY
Perceived Helpfulness of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.43; 4.42
SECONDARY
Perceived Helpfulness of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.43; 4.42
SECONDARY
Perceived Helpfulness of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.43; 4.42
SECONDARY
Perceived Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.21; 4.32
SECONDARY
Perceived Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.21; 4.32
SECONDARY
Perceived Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.21; 4.32
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.29; 4.34
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.29; 4.34
SECONDARY
Perceived Parental Comfort of Parental Communication About Different Topics as Assessed by One-Item From an Adapted Version of the Modified Miller Communication Scale
4.29; 4.34
SECONDARY
Perceived Confidence in Communication About Different Topics With Parent as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.79; 2.16
SECONDARY
Perceived Confidence in Communication About Different Topics With Parent as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.79; 2.16
SECONDARY
Perceived Confidence in Communication About Different Topics With Parent as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.79; 2.16
SECONDARY
Youth's Attitudes Towards Need for Consent as Assessed by the Adapted Version of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised
3.10; 2.96
SECONDARY
Youth's Attitudes Towards Need for Consent as Assessed by the Adapted Version of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised
3.10; 2.96
SECONDARY
Youth's Attitudes Towards Need for Consent as Assessed by the Adapted Version of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised
3.10; 2.96
SECONDARY
Knowledge of the Select, Detect, Protect Decision-Making Paradigm as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
7; 5; 19; 42
SECONDARY
Knowledge of the Select, Detect, Protect Decision-Making Paradigm as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
7; 5; 19; 42
SECONDARY
Knowledge of the Select, Detect, Protect Decision-Making Paradigm as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
7; 5; 19; 42
SECONDARY
Responsible Decision-Making as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Responsible Decision-Making Subscale
2.81; 2.70
SECONDARY
Responsible Decision-Making as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Responsible Decision-Making Subscale
2.81; 2.70
SECONDARY
Responsible Decision-Making as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Responsible Decision-Making Subscale
2.81; 2.70
SECONDARY
Emotional Regulation as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Emotional Regulation Subscale
2.35; 2.43
SECONDARY
Emotional Regulation as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Emotional Regulation Subscale
2.35; 2.43
SECONDARY
Emotional Regulation as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - The Emotional Regulation Subscale
2.35; 2.43
SECONDARY
Youth's Goal Management as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Goal Management Subscale
2.67; 2.63
SECONDARY
Youth's Goal Management as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Goal Management Subscale
2.67; 2.63
SECONDARY
Youth's Goal Management as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Goal Management Subscale
2.67; 2.63
SECONDARY
Youth's Emotional Knowledge as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Emotional Knowledge Subscale
2.65; 2.61
SECONDARY
Youth's Emotional Knowledge as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Emotional Knowledge Subscale
2.65; 2.61
SECONDARY
Youth's Emotional Knowledge as Assessed by the Social and Emotional Competency Assessment - Emotional Knowledge Subscale
2.65; 2.61
SECONDARY
Youth's Likeliness to Seek Help From a Parent/Caregiver as Assessed by One Item From the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire
2.68; 2.77
SECONDARY
Youth's Likeliness to Seek Help From a Parent/Caregiver as Assessed by One Item From the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire
2.68; 2.77
SECONDARY
Youth's Likeliness to Seek Help From a Parent/Caregiver as Assessed by One Item From the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire
2.68; 2.77
SECONDARY
Bullying Perpetration as Assessed by Adapted Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students - Bully Perpetration Subscale
5; 7; 22; 41
SECONDARY
Bullying Perpetration as Assessed by Adapted Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students - Bully Perpetration Subscale
5; 7; 22; 41
SECONDARY
Bully Victimization as Assessed by Adapted Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students - Bully Victimization Subscale
10; 19; 17; 30
SECONDARY
Bully Victimization as Assessed by Adapted Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students - Bully Victimization Subscale
10; 19; 17; 30
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Caregiver Communication as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.60; 1.56
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Caregiver Communication as Assessed by a One-Item Questionnaire
1.60; 1.56
SECONDARY
Youth Perception of Caregiver Rules About Dating as Assessed by a Questionnaire
3.88; 3.46
SECONDARY
Youth Perception of Caregiver Rules About Dating as Assessed by a Questionnaire
3.88; 3.46
SECONDARY
Youth Perception of Parental Monitoring as Assessed by a Questionnaire
2.80; 2.90
SECONDARY
Youth Perception of Parental Monitoring as Assessed by a Questionnaire
2.80; 2.90
SECONDARY
Youth Perceived Parental Closeness as Assessed by a Questionnaire
3.57; 3.39
SECONDARY
Youth Perceived Parental Closeness as Assessed by a Questionnaire
3.57; 3.39
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Their School Climate as Assessed by Survey Items From the Dating Matters School Educator Survey
3.40; 3.10
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Their School Climate as Assessed by Survey Items From the Dating Matters School Educator Survey
3.40; 3.10
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Their School's Teen Dating Violence Climate as Assessed by Survey Items From the Dating Matters School Educator Survey
0.51; 0.38
SECONDARY
Youth's Perception of Their School's Teen Dating Violence Climate as Assesed by Survey Items From the Dating Matters School Educator Survey
0.53; 0.66
SECONDARY
Knowledge of Human Trafficking as Assessed by a Questionnaire
0.55; 0.46
SECONDARY
Knowledge of Human Trafficking as Assessed by a Questionnaire
0.55; 0.46
SECONDARY
Knowledge of Human Trafficking as Assessed by a Questionnaire
0.55; 0.46
SECONDARY
Perception of Positive Relationship Skills as Assessed by a Questionnaire
1.79; 1.88
SECONDARY
Perception of Positive Relationship Skills as Assessed by a Questionnaire
1.79; 1.88
SECONDARY
Perception of Peer Risk Behaviors as Assessed by the Perception of Peer In-Person and Electronic Dating Violence Perpetration Subscale
1.18; 1.10
SECONDARY
Perception of Peer Risk Behaviors as Assessed by the Perception of Peer In-Person and Electronic Dating Violence Perpetration Subscale
1.18; 1.10
SECONDARY
Perception of Peer Risk Behaviors as Assessed by the Perception of Peer Substance Use and Fighting Subscale
1.33; 1.50
SECONDARY
Perception of Peer Risk Behaviors as Assessed by the Perception of Peer Substance Use and Fighting Subscale
1.33; 1.50

Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a multi-level (youth, parent, school) Internet-based dating violence prevention program, 'Me & You-Tech' (MYT) for 6th-grade middle school students.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 6th grade student
  • Currently attending a middle school

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous participation in usability and feasibility testing
  • Inability to complete activities
  • Inability to read English
  • Lack of home internet connectivity
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05225727). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search