Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=40 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Symmetric vs Asymmetric BLR Recession in Management of Basic IXT With Ocular Dominance

Intermittent Exotropia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05234957 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Ocular Alignment at Distant Fixation — 5.8; 1.1 prism diopter

Summary

The study aims to investigate ocular motor and sensory outcomes of two different strategies of lateral rectus recession; symmetric and asymmetric, in management of basic type intermittent exotropia with ocular dominance.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Ocular Alignment at Distant Fixation
5.8; 1.1
PRIMARY
Ocular Alignment at Near Fixation
6.6; 3.5
SECONDARY
Sensory Status (Stereopsis)
124; 119.5
SECONDARY
Sensory Status (Fusion)
5; 6; 15; 14

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Basic-type intermittent exotropia
  • Simulated distant-type intermittent exotropia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Alternating basic-type intermittent exotropia (no ocular dominance)
  • Distant-type intermittent exotropia
  • Convergence-insufficiency type intermittent exotropia
  • Constant exotropia
  • Sensory exotropia
  • Deep amblyopia
  • Paralytic or restrictive exotropia
  • Previous extraocular muscle surgery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05234957). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search