N/A
N=40
Symmetric vs Asymmetric BLR Recession in Management of Basic IXT With Ocular Dominance
Intermittent Exotropia
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05234957 ↗Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Ocular Alignment at Distant Fixation — 5.8; 1.1 prism diopter
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession (Procedure)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 4+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Benha University
- Primary completion
- Apr 2023
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Ocular Alignment at Distant Fixation |
5.8; 1.1 | — |
| PRIMARY Ocular Alignment at Near Fixation |
6.6; 3.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Sensory Status (Stereopsis) |
124; 119.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Sensory Status (Fusion) |
5; 6; 15; 14 | — |
Summary
The study aims to investigate ocular motor and sensory outcomes of two different strategies of lateral rectus recession; symmetric and asymmetric, in management of basic type intermittent exotropia with ocular dominance.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Basic-type intermittent exotropia
- Simulated distant-type intermittent exotropia
Exclusion Criteria
- Alternating basic-type intermittent exotropia (no ocular dominance)
- Distant-type intermittent exotropia
- Convergence-insufficiency type intermittent exotropia
- Constant exotropia
- Sensory exotropia
- Deep amblyopia
- Paralytic or restrictive exotropia
- Previous extraocular muscle surgery
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05234957). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.