N/A
Completed N=208
Sign Here: How to Conduct Informed Consent With Deaf Individuals
Cultural Competency
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05268055 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
208
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency — 40.5; 42.7; 48.7; 41.3 score on a scale — p=0.525
Summary
The goal of this research is to create a training film for hearing healthcare providers to teach them how to competently and sensitively interact with Deaf patients. In Year 1, focus groups will be facilitated to elicit feedback that will inform video production of the training film. In Year 2, film production will take place, as well as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the new training intervention.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency |
40.5; 42.7; 48.7; 41.3; 33.0; 44.3 | 0.525 |
| PRIMARY Ask, Understand, Remember Assessment |
12.5; 13.5; 14.4; 13.2; 10.8; 13.7 | 0.200 |
| PRIMARY Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale |
36.4; 39.1; 41.6; 38.4; 31.6; 39.8 | 0.246 |
| SECONDARY Assessment of Intervention Understanding & Retention |
22.1; 21.2; 21.9; 21.8; 22.3; 20.5 | 0.212 |
| SECONDARY Self-Rating of Simulation |
42.6; 41.9; 12.7; 13.2; 37.7; 39.9 | 0.752 |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- age 18+
- self-identification as a healthcare provider, medical student, or nursing student
- current or recent engagement in informed consent for treatment
- access to an informed consent form that can be used for a simulated informed consent session
- We will also screen participants' self-reported level of experience with Deaf people, as we aim to recruit participants with little-to-no prior experience interacting with Deaf people to reflect the most probable real-word encounter that a Deaf person would have when receiving healthcare services.
Exclusion Criteria
- none
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05268055). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.