Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=16 Randomized Single-blind Diagnostic

Word Retrieval in the Wild in People With Post-Stroke Aphasia

Aphasia, Acquired

Enrolled (actual)
16
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Protocol Compliance — 67.35; 86.98 Percent response/n scheduled prompts — p=0.021

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Traditional EMA (Behavioral); Micro-Interaction EMA (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Northeastern University
Primary completion
Jan 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Protocol Compliance
67.35; 86.98 0.021 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Protocol Completion
75.13; 92.47 0.027 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Audio Intelligibility
87.08; 88.23
SECONDARY
Change in Perceived Burden
4.48; 4.43

Summary

People with post-stroke aphasia (PWA) suffer from anomia, a condition where they know what they want to say but cannot retrieve the words. For PWA, word retrieval changes moment-to-moment, leading to diminished motivation to participate in conversations and disengagement from social interactions. In the real world, anomia variability and severity are compounded by contextual factors of communication exchanges (noise, dual-tasking). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves in-situ measurement of a behavior over time during everyday life. EMA has promise for capturing real-world anomia, yet EMA methods have not been tested in PWA. Therefore, the aims of this pilot study are to (1) determine the relative feasibility of two types of smartwatch-delivered EMA (traditional-EMA and micro-EMA) in PWA and (2) determine the extent to which patient-specific factors relate to feasibility. Twenty PWA will be recruited and randomly assigned to either traditional-EMA or micro-EMA conditions. To target in-situ anomia, PWA will complete 36 picture-naming trials/day for three weeks, delivered either as a single trial 36 times per day (micro-EMA) or in four sets of nine trials/set per day (traditional-EMA). Due to the "at-a-glance" single trial delivery of micro-EMA, the investigators hypothesize that PWA in the micro-EMA condition will demonstrate better protocol adherence than PWA in the traditional-EMA condition. Older age, more severe cognitive-linguistic deficits, and greater discomfort with technology will be related to poorer compliance, lower completion, greater perceived burden, and lower intelligibility of naming audio recordings. This bench-to-bedside research will begin a translational path to implement EMA/micro-EMA into routine assessment of aphasia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Current/pre-stroke English proficiency,
  • Normal/corrected-to-normal vision and hearing,
  • Medical stability,
  • History of left hemisphere stroke at least six months prior to enrollment, and
  • Presence of aphasia

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of neurological disease affecting the brain other than stroke
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05338216). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search