Phase 3
N=478
Comparison of Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05345691 ↗Enrolled (actual)
478
Serious AEs
5.3%
Results posted
Aug 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density) — 1.698; 1.440 Percent change
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- Bmab 1000 (Biological); Prolia® (Biological)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 55+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- Biocon Biologics UK Ltd
- Primary completion
- Jun 2024
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density) |
1.698; 1.440 | — |
| SECONDARY AUEC (Area Under the Effect Curve) of the Bone Resorption Marker sCTX (Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen) |
127; 123 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD |
3.872; 3.699 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) |
2.224; 2.132 | — |
| SECONDARY Serum Concentrations of P1NP (Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide) |
69.4; 42.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of TEAEs (Treatment-emergent Adverse Events) up to 6 Months After the Second Dose |
55; 29; 27 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) |
215; 205 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) |
215; 205 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 |
3; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) |
2.224; 2.132 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 |
3; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change From Baseline in Hip BMD |
4.011; 4.052; 3.483 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD |
2.138; 1.767 | — |
| SECONDARY Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX |
41.5; 41.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 26 |
53.6; 40.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 52 |
69.4; 42.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 78 |
87.6; 72.1; 66.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD |
2.138; 1.767 | — |
Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm, Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, PK (Pharmacokinetic), PD (Pharmacodynamic), safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Postmenopausal women, aged ≥55 and <80 years at screening. Postmenopausal is defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) levels ≥40 mIU/mL at screening or 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy.
- Evidence of osteoporosis as assessed by lumbar spine (L1-L4) absolute BMD corresponding to a T-score classification ≤-2.5 and ≥-4.0.
- At least 3 vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint are evaluable by DXA at screening.
- Patients with body weight ≥50 to <90 kg at screening.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with T-score of <-4.0 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck.
- Known history of previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or any biosimilar denosumab).
- For prior or ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment (other than calcium and vitamin D supplements) following points to be considered for the washout periods prior to the screening visit:
a. Oral bisphosphonate i. Ineligible if used for 3 or more years cumulatively ii. If used for <3 years, a gap of at least 1 year since the last dose is required at the screening visit b. Dose received any time
- Systemic glucocorticosteroids
- Patients with ongoing serious infections
- Evidence of any of the following per the patient's history, DXA, or X-ray review and/or current disease:
- Patient in bed rest for 2 or more weeks during the last 3 months prior to screening
- Current hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism
- History and/or current hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism
- Current hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia based on albumin-adjusted serum calcium
- Any bone disease including bone metastasis or metabolic disease (except for osteoporosis), eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease, ALP (alkaline phosphatase) elevation (at investigator's discretion), Cushing's disease, clinically significant hyperprolactinemia (at investigator's discretion), fibrous dysplasia, malabsorption syndrome which may interfere with the interpretation of the results
- History and/or presence of one severe or 3 or more moderate vertebral fractures
- History and/or presence of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement
- Presence of an active healing fracture according to assessment of investigator
- History of severe skeletal pain with bisphosphonates which, as per the investigator, is a risk to her participation in the trial
- Oral/dental or periodontal conditions:
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05345691). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.