Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=35 Randomized Health Services Research

Comparing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters to Long Peripheral Catheters in Pediatrics

Vascular Access Device Complications

Enrolled (actual)
35
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent Eligible Patients That Agreed to Participate — 80 percentage of eligible patients agreed t

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Midline Catheter (Device); Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 2+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Primary completion
Aug 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent Eligible Patients That Agreed to Participate
80
PRIMARY
Average Dwell-time
11.0; 4.7; 8.5; 8.0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Completed Therapy With Initial VAD
4; 1; 6; 15
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With at Least One Complications
2; 3; 3; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Received Sedation for VAD Placement
4; 3; 5; 18
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With VAD Successfully Used for Blood Draws
4; 2; 5; 10
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Requiring Additional VADs to Complete Therapy
0; 3; 1; 4

Summary

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are frequently used in hospitalized children who require prolonged vascular access; however, concerns regarding their inappropriate use and contribution to serious complications such as central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have triggered exploration of safer alternatives. Long Peripheral Catheters (LPCs) have been recently adopted by some institutions due to fewer complications as compared to PICCs. The investigators hypothesize that LPCs could be safer alternatives to PICCs for medium-term vascular access (5-14 days) in the appropriate cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients. The primary objective of the proposed clinical effectiveness pilot trial is to test the feasibility of a full-scale effectiveness trial comparing PICCs to LPCs in hospitalized pediatric patients. The investigators aim to identify a population in which LPCs are safe and effective alternatives to PICCs for medium-term, non-central vascular access; data that will inform the design of a full-scale effectiveness study. The investigators plan to engage patients and families as advisors in vascular access device selection by understanding their experience with vascular access device placement and maintenance. Over time, use of LPCs should result in decreased inappropriate PICC utilization with a concomitant decrease in serious complications such as CLABSI and VTE.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients age 2 to 17 years admitted to Children's Wisconsin and requesting placement of a PICC for:
  • anticipated length of intravenous treatment of 5-14 days AND
  • peripherally compatible infusate AND
  • VAD not needed at discharge

Exclusion Criteria

  • non-English-speaking family
  • active bacteremia or VTE at site where device would be placed
  • urgent need of vascular access (within 4 hours)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05346406). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search