Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=16 Randomized Diagnostic

AT GOAL: Adopting Technology for Glucose Optimization and Lifestyle in Pregnancy

Type2Diabetes · Pregnancy in Diabetic

Enrolled (actual)
16
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Feasibility: Number of Participants Who Complete the Study Within 24 Month Time Period — 8; 8 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Dexcom G6 CGM (Device); Participant Finger Stick Glucose Monitoring (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Primary completion
Oct 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Feasibility: Number of Participants Who Complete the Study Within 24 Month Time Period
8; 8
PRIMARY
Change in Qualitative Survey Answers to Assess Participant Thoughts and Experiences With Diabetes Management
2.5; 2.8; 2.6; 2.1; 3.5; 2.5
PRIMARY
Percentage of Time Where Blood Glucose is Between 70-140 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) - Time in Range
64; 65; 72; 55
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Cesarean Delivery
5; 7
SECONDARY
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (Percentage) From Initiation to Third Trimester
-0.2; 0.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time Spent in Hyperglycemic Range
11; 22; 16; 22
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemic Range
1; 2; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Rates of Gestational Hypertension
3; 0
SECONDARY
Rates of Preeclampsia
2; 1
SECONDARY
Rates of Polyhydramnios
1; 0
SECONDARY
Incidence of Neonatal Hypoglycemia
2; 3
SECONDARY
Rates of Fetal Macrosomia
1; 1
SECONDARY
Rates of NICU Admission
3; 2
SECONDARY
Rates of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery
1; 1
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey Scores (5-point Likert Scale)
35.2; 34.8; 27.6; 35.2; 29.6; 38.3
SECONDARY
Qualitative Outcome: Semi-Structured Interviews to Explore How Glucose Monitoring Affects Participants Thoughts and Feelings
7; 0; 1; 3; 3; 0
SECONDARY
Qualitative Outcome: Interviews to Understand Participant Sense of Control Around Glucose Monitoring
3; 6; 1; 6; 4; 0
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey - How Satisfied Are You Currently With the Amount of Time it Takes to Manage Your Diabetes?
3.2; 2.6; 1.7; 2.2; 2.6; 3.0
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey - How Satisfied Are You With the Time it Takes to Determine Your Sugar Level?
2.5; 2.6; 1.5; 2.4; 2.0; 2.5
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey - How Satisfied Are You With the Total Time it Has Taken to Manage Your Diabetes Over the Last 2 Weeks?
3.4; 2.6; 1.8; 2.4; 2.9; 2.8
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey - How Satisfied Are You With Your Current Diabetes Treatment?
2.6; 2.0; 1.8; 1.8; 1.9; 2.0
SECONDARY
Satisfaction and Quality of Life Survey - How Satisfied Are You With Time Spent Getting Checkups for Your Diabetes?
3.4; 2.4; 1.7; 2.0; 2.7; 3.2

Summary

This study will assess differences in patient preferences and glucose control between continuous glucose monitoring and standard glucose checks in pregnant patients with Type 2 Diabetes. 40 participants will be on study for approximately 182 days (26 weeks).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years of age at enrollment
  • Ability to consent in English
  • Gestational age less than or equal to 19 weeks 6 days at enrollment
  • Appropriate dating by certain LMP or ultrasound performed less than or equal to 19 weeks 6 day
  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes less than or equal to 19 weeks 6 days
  • Singleton gestation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age less than 18 years of age at enrollment
  • Lack of appropriate dating
  • Multiple gestations
  • Use of concentrated insulin at enrollment (ie U500)
  • Preexisting CGM in place
  • Chronic use of medications known to cause hyperglycemia, such as HIV antiretrovirals and inhaled, injectable and oral corticosteroids
  • Be unwilling or unable to present to Center for Perinatal Care for visits
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05370612). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search