Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=20 Treatment

Lab Evaluation of Novel Hearing Aid Coupling Method

Hearing Loss

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Sound Quality Ratings While Streaming — 43.15; 60.025; 64.025; 49.00 Units on a rating scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Recordings of Hearing Aids with Open Domes (Device); Recordings of Hearing Aids with Closed Domes (Device); Recordings of Hearing Aids with Novel State 1 (Device); Recordings of Hearing Aids with Novel State 2 (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sonova AG
Primary completion
Nov 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sound Quality Ratings While Streaming
43.15; 60.025; 64.025; 49.00; 62.9; 68.325
SECONDARY
Situational Preference Ratings
82.225; 23.125; 50.35; 21.95; 84.225; 29.2

Summary

Evaluation of different hearing aid coupling methods including two states of a novel coupling method and two traditional coupling methods.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Hearing aid candidate
  • Meets the fitting requirements for novel and traditional coupling options
  • Healthy outer ear - no visible congenital or traumatic deformity
  • Symmetrical hearing loss
  • No air-bone gap greater than 10 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz
  • Ability to answer questions and repeat sentences
  • No history of problematic tinnitus or pain/discomfort from loud sounds
  • No history of active drainage from the ears in the past 90 days
  • Informed consent as documented by signature.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Limited mobility (not able to attend scheduled visits)
  • Inability to produce reliable hearing test results
  • History of active drainage from the ear in the previous 90 days
  • Abnormal appearance of the eardrum and ear canal
  • Known psychological problems.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05377359). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search