Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=28 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Impact of 2 Resuscitation Sequences on Management of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

Cardiopulmonary Arrest · Pediatric ALL · Resuscitation

Enrolled (actual)
28
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Median Alveolar Ventilation — 276; 370 ml

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
AHA resuscitation sequence (Other); ERC resuscitation sequence (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Geneve TEAM Ambulances
Primary completion
Sep 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Median Alveolar Ventilation
276; 370
SECONDARY
The Total Number of Ventilations
10; 13
SECONDARY
The Percentage of Ventilations Within, Above and Below the Target Volume
0; 4; 75; 76; 0; 3
SECONDARY
The Alveolar Ventilation Obtained Without Taking Ventilation Volumes Over 70 ml Into Account, Reported as the Median Value of the Ventilations Over the First Minute.
271; 365
SECONDARY
The Percentage of Compressions of Correct Depth
0; 0; 89; 91
SECONDARY
The Percentage of Chest Compressions Within, Above and Below the Target Rate.
3; 0; 90; 91; 0; 1
SECONDARY
The Chest Compression Fraction (CCF)
66; 57
SECONDARY
The Percentage of Compressions With Adequate Chest Recoil
76; 93

Summary

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation regularly publishes a Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations but guidelines can nevertheless differ when knowledge gaps persist. In case of pediatric cardiac arrest, the American Heart Association recommends following the adult resuscitation sequence i.e., starting with chest compressions. Conversely, the European Resuscitation Council advocates the delivery of 5 initial rescue breaths before starting chest compressions. Carrying out a randomized trial in children in cardiac arrest to assess the impact of these strategies would prove particularly challenging and ethical concerns may prevent such a trial from being performed. This will be a superiority, cross-over randomized trial whose goal is to determine the impact of these 2 resuscitation sequences on alveolar ventilation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest. While not definitive, its results could help fill part of the current knowledge gap.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Being issued from one of the following profession: Emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, nurses and physicians

Exclusion Criteria

  • Being member of the study team
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05474170). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search